Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:13:51.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constraining Arrest for Breach of the Peace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2001

Get access

Extract

Given that it was no more than a decision of the Divisional Court, and a pre-War decision at that, the case of Duncan v. Jones [1936] 1 K.B. 218 has exercised a remarkably enduring influence. The case appeared to give the police enormous operational discretion in dealing with actual and prospective breaches of the peace. When a constable reasonably apprehended a breach of the peace, he could take steps (arguably, only reasonable steps) to prevent it or its recurrence. This disarmingly simple formula made it very difficult to challenge, let alone control, the way in which the police exercised their powers.

Type
Case and Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)