Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:12:36.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE BIOLOGY OF POLLENIA RUDIS, THE CLUSTER FLY (DIPTERA: CALLIPHORIDAE): II. LARVAL FEEDING BEHAVIOUR AND HOST SPECIFICITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. J. Thomson
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
D. M. Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario

Abstract

Parasitism by Pollenia rudis (Fabr.) larvae on earthworms in the field was found only in Allolobophora chlorotica (Sav.) and Eisenia rosea (Sav.). Other species of worms were infected in the laboratory. Slime and coelomic fluid, from all species of worms tested, induced penetration behaviour. Penetration occurs mainly on the dorsal surface of the worm, and less frequently towards either end. Larvae repenetrated after leaving the original penetration site. Autonomy by the host of the parasitized segments was observed in E. rosea. Possible reasons for the restricted natural host range are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DeCoursey, R. M. 1927. A bionomical study of the cluster fly, Pollenia rudis (Fabr.) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 20: 368384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCoursey, R. M. 1932. The feeding habits of the first instar larva of the cluster fly. Science 75: 287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, A. C. 1947. A method of studying the burrowing activities of earthworms. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 14: 643650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, S. L. 1924. Rearing records of Pollenia rudis (Fabr.). Ent. News 35: 135138.Google Scholar
Hower, A. M. S. 1965. A study of the biology of Eisenia rosea (Sav.) with particular reference to soil moisture conditions. M.Sc. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. 1915. Recherches sur les larves des Diptères Cyclorrhaphes. Bull. Sci. Fr. Belg. 49: 15198, pts. I–XVI.Google Scholar
Laverack, M. S. 1963. The physiology of earthworms. Pergamon Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murchie, W. R. 1956. Survey of the Michigan earthworm fauna. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci. 41: 5372.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D. and Epstein, B.. 1960. The cluster fly Pollenia rudis (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 53: 553554.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. J. 1972 (unpub.). The ecology of Pollenia rudis (Diptera: Calliphoridae) and its host earthworms (Lumbricidae), with special reference to the host-parasite relationship between P. rudis and Eisenia rosea. Ph.D. Thesis, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ont.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. J. and Davies, D. M.. 1973. The biology of Pollenia rudis, the cluster fly (Diptera: Calliphoridae). I. Host location by first-instar larvae. Can. Ent. 105: 335341.Google Scholar
Webb, J. L. and Hutchison, H. H.. 1916. A preliminary note on the bionomics of Pollenia rudis (Fabr.) in America. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 18: 197199.Google Scholar
Yahnke, W. and George, J. A.. 1972. Rearing and immature stages of the cluster fly (Pollenia rudis) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Ontario. Can. Ent. 104: 567576.Google Scholar