Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T12:36:09.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LO087: Emergency department patients’ connection to primary care providers: reasons for lack of connection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2016

L. Krebs
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
S.W. Kirkland
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
K. Crick
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
C. Villa-Roel
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
A. Davidson
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
B. Voaklander
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
B. Holroyd
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
E. Cross
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
T. Nikel
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
R. Chetram
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
S. Couperthwaite
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
G. Cummings
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
D. Voaklander
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
B.H. Rowe
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: Some non-urgent/low-acuity Emergency Department (ED) presentations are considered convenience visits and potentially avoidable with improved access to primary care services. This study surveyed patients who presented to the ED and explored their self-reported reasons and barriers for not being connected to a primary care provider (PCP). Methods: Patients aged 17 years and older were randomly selected from electronic registration records at three urban EDs in Edmonton, Alberta (AB), Canada. Following initial triage, stabilization, and verbal informed consent, patients completed a 47-item questionnaire. Data from the survey were cross-referenced to a minimal patient dataset consisting of ED and demographic information. The questionnaire collected information on patient characteristics, their connection to a PCP, and patients' reasons for not having a PCP. Results: Of the 2144 eligible patients, 1408 (65.7%) surveys were returned and 1402 (65.4%) were completed. The majority of patients (74.4%) presenting to the ED reported having a family physician; however, the ‘closeness’ of the connection to their family physician varied greatly among ED patients with the most recent family physician visit ranging from 1 hour before ED presentation to 45 years prior. Approximately 25% of low acuity ED patients reported no connection with a family physician. Reasons for a lack of PCP connection included: prior physician retired, left, or died (19.8%), they had never tried to find one (19.2%), they had recently moved to Alberta (18.0%), and they were unable to find one (16.5%). Conclusion: A surprisingly high proportion of ED patients (25.6%) have no identified PCP. Patients had a variety of reasons for not having a family physician. These need to be understood and addressed in order for primary care access to successfully contribute to diverting non-urgent, low acuity presentations from the ED.

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2016