Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:04:06.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LO52: Combination of easily measurable real time variables to predict ED crowding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2017

R.V. Clouston*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, NB
M. Howlett
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, NB
G. Stoica
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, NB
J. Fraser
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, NB
P.R. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, NB
*
*Corresponding authors

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: Almost every domain of quality is reduced in crowded emergency departments (ED), with significant challenges around the definition, measurement and interventions for ED crowding. We wished to determine if a combination of 3 easily measurable variables could perform as well as standard tools (NEDOCS score and a NEDOCS-derived LOCAL tool) in predicting ED crowding at a tertiary hospital with 57,000 visits per year. Methods: Over a 2-week period, we recorded ED crowding predictor variables and calculated NEDOCS and LOCAL scores. These were compared every 2 hours to a reference standard Physician Visual Analog Scale (range 0 to 10) impression of crowding to determine if any combination of variables outperformed NEDOCS and LOCAL (crowded=5 or greater). Five numeric variables performed well under univariate analysis: i) Total ED Patients; ii) Patients in ED beds + Waiting Room; iii) Boarded Patients; iv) Waiting Room Patients; v) Patients in beds To Be Seen. These underwent multivariate, log regression with stratification and bootstrapping to account for incomplete data and seasonal and daily effect. Results: 143 out of a possible 168 observations were completed. Two different combinations of 3 variables outperformed NEDOCS and LOCAL. The most powerful combination was: Boarded Patients; plus Waiting Room Patients; plus Patients in beds To Be Seen, with Sensitivity 81% and Specificity 76% (r=0.844, β=0.712, p<0.0001, strong positive correlation). This compared favourably with NEDOCS and LOCAL, each with Sensitivity 71% and Specificity 64%[PA1] (r=0.545 and r=0.640 respectively). We will also present a sensitivity and specificity analysis of all combinations of predictor variables, using various reference standard cut-offs for crowding. Conclusion: A combination of 3 easily measurable ED variables (Boarded Patients; plus Waiting Room Patients; plus Patients in beds To Be Seen) performed better than the validated NEDOCS tool and a NEDOCS-derived LOCAL score at predicting ED crowding. Work is on going to design a simple tool that can predict crowding in real time and facilitate early interventions. Correlation with ED system and clinical outcomes should be studied in different ED environments.

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2017