Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:41:45.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Normes de l’ACMU : la médecine d’urgence et sa tour d’ivoire?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Samuel G. Campbell
Samuel G. Campbell*
Affiliation:
Comité des normes de l'ACMU, du département de médecine d'urgence de l'Université Dalhousie et du Centre des sciences de la santé Queen Elizabeth II, Halifax, N.-É
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, QE II HSC, Université Dalhousie, 3021-1796, rue Summer, Halifax NS B3H 3A7; EMSGC@cdha.nshealth.ca

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorials • Éditoriaux
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 10 , Issue 5 , September 2008 , pp. 464 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2008

References

Références bibliographiques

1.Green, RS, Djogovic, D, Gray, S, et al. “Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians sepsis guidelines: the optimal management of severe sepsis in Canadian emergency departments”, CJEM 2008;10:443–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Rivers, E, Nguyen, B, Havstad, S, et al. “Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock”, N Engl J Med, 2001;345:1368–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Nguyen, HB, Rivers, EP, Abrahamian, FM, et al. “Severe sepsis and septic shock: review of the literature and emergency department management guidelines”, Ann Emerg Med, 2006;48:28–54.Google Scholar
4.Raghavan, M, Marik, PE. “Management of sepsis during the early ‘golden hours’”, J Emerg Med, 2006;31:185–99.Google Scholar
5.De Miguel-Yanes, JM, Andueza-Lillo, JA, González-Ramallo, VJ, et al. “Failure to implement evidence-based clinical guidelines for sepsis at the ED”, Am J Emerg Med, 2006;24:5539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Rivers, EP, McIntyre, L, Morro, DC, et al. “Early and innovative interventions for severe sepsis and septic shock: taking advantage of a window of opportunity”, CMAJ, 2005;173:1054–65.Google Scholar
7.Surviving Sepsis Campaign. International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock 2008. Crit Care Med 2008;36:296–327.Google Scholar
8.Comité des normes de l’ACMU. Mandat. Disponible à : www.caep.ca/page.asp?id=6C8BB1063C594F598FABF3BFE5DD0C1C (consulté le 8 août 2008).Google Scholar
9.The AGREE Collaboration. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. Disponible à : www.agreecollaboration.org (consulté le 8 août 2008).Google Scholar
10.Société de la médecine rurale du Canada. Disponible à : www.srpc.ca/ (consulté le 8 août 2008).Google Scholar
11.Innes, G. “Thinking outside the box” [éditorial]. JCMU, 2002;4:316.Google Scholar
12.Brothers, A. “Thinking outside the box” [lettre]. JCMU, 2002;4:387.Google Scholar
13.Laroque, D. “Thinking outside the box” [lettre]. JCMU, 2002;4:387.Google Scholar