Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:05:33.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public risk from tasers: Unacceptably high or low enough to accept?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Christine A. Hall
Christine A. Hall*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Vancouver Island Health Authority, Vancouver, BC; Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 84 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2009

References

1.Han, JS, Chopra, A, Carr, C.Ophthalmic injuries from a TASER. CJEM 2009;11:90–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police, Board of Directors. A national use of force framework. Ottawa (ON): The Association;2000.Available: http://ilecnet.org/Standards/Canada%20National %20Use%20of%20Force%20Model%202000.pdf (accessed 2008 Nov 24).Google Scholar
3.Bozeman, WP, Winslow, JE, Hauda, WE II, et al.Injury profile of TASER electrical conducted energy weapons (CEWs). 39th Scientific Assembly of the American College of Emergency Physicians. Seattle (WA): Oct 8–11, 2007.Google Scholar
4.Butler, C.Force Science News # 102. Mankato (MN): Force Science Research Center; 2008. Available:http://www.forcescience news.com/home/current.html(accessed 2008 Nov 24).Google Scholar
5.Amnesty International. Amnesty International’s continuing concerns about taser use. London (UK): Amnesty International; 2008. Available:www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AMR51/030 /2006/en/dom-AMR510302006en.pdf (accessed 2008 Nov 24).Google Scholar
6.American Civil Liberties Union. Citizen deaths in police custody, ACLU of Colorado call for limits on use of electroshock weapons. New York (NY): The Union; 2004. Avaialble:http://www.aclu.org/crimjustice/gen/10119prs20040226.html (accessed 2008 Nov 24).Google Scholar
7.Nanthakumar, K, Billingsley, IM, Masse, S, et al.Cardiac electro-physiological consequences of neuromuscular incapacitating device discharges. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:798–804.Google Scholar
8.Dennis, AJ, Valentino, DJ, Walter, RJ, et al.Acute effects of Taser X26: discharges in a swine model. J Trauma 2007;63:581–9.Google Scholar
9.Kiedrowski, J, Petrunik, M, Melchers, R.An independent review of the adoption and use of conducted energy weapons by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Ottawa (ON): Royal Canadian Mounted Police; 2008. Available: http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca.ccaps /cew/kiedrowski_report_e.htm (accessed 2008 Nov 24).Google Scholar
10.Braidwood Inquiry Media Release. Victoria (BC): Province of BC; 2008. http://www.braidwoodinquiry.ca/Google Scholar
11.Breitkreuz, G.Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security: study of the conductive energy weapon - TASER. Ottawa (ON): House of Commons Canada; 2008. Available:http://www2.par.gc.ca/Content/HOC/Committee/392/SECU/Reports/RP3582906/392_SECU_Rpt04_PDF/392_SECU_Rpt04-e.pdf (accessed 2008 Nov 24).Google Scholar
12.Luceri, RM.An open letter to the law enforcement community. Florida Arrhythmia Consultants. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:732.Google Scholar
13.Kroll, MW, Calkins, H, Luceri, RM.Electronic control devices and the clinical milieu. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:732–3.Google Scholar
14.Kroll, MW, Calkins, H, Luceri, RM, et al.Electronic control devices. CMAJ 2008;179:342–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed