Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:32:19.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Expressions duratives postverbales en chinois mandarin à l'interface syntactico-sémantique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2018

Xiaoqian Zhang*
Affiliation:
Institut de Linguistique, Académie Chinoise de Sciences Sociales
Yiqin Qiu*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle, Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7
Xiaoshi Hu*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle, Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7

Résumé

L'expression durative postverbale en chinois mandarin a été traitée dans quatre approches différentes dans la littérature, à savoir l'approche de complément, l'approche de prédicat, la cooccurrence des structures de complément et de prédicat et l'approche d'adjoint. Dans cet article, nous proposons une analyse combinatoire par adjoint et par prédicat en tenant compte des facteurs à la fois syntaxiques et sémantiques non seulement de l'expression durative postverbale, mais aussi des verbes et des objets auxquels les duratifs peuvent s'attacher. Nous avons pour objectif de montrer que ce sont ces facteurs conjoints qui permettent de déterminer la distribution en surface et la position syntaxique de l'expression durative postverbale en chinois mandarin.

Abstract

Postverbal durative expressions in Mandarin Chinese have been treated in four different ways in the literature: as complements, as predicates, as both complements and predicates, and as adjuncts. In this article, we propose a combination of the adjunct and predicate analyses, taking into account both syntactic and semantic properties not only of the postverbal durative expression, but also of the verbs and the objects to which the duratives can attach. Our objective is to show that these factors together give rise to an account of the surface distribution and the syntactic position of the postverbal durative expression in Mandarin Chinese.

Type
Article
Copyright
© Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Nous tenons à remercier Lucia M. Tovena, Alain Rouveret, Victor Junnan Pan, Hamida Demirdache, Audrey Li, Haihua Pan, Dylan Tsai et Caterina Donati pour les nombreuses discussions sur le présent travail. Nous remercions également pour leurs commentaires trois évaluateurs anonymes de la RCL. Un grand merci à Margot Colinet pour la relecture du français.

References

Références

Ai, Ruixi Ressy. 2006. Elliptical predicate constructions in Mandarin. Thèse de doctorat, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Bennett, Michael et Partee, Barbara H.. 1972. Toward the logic of tense and aspect in English. Dans Compositionality in formal semantics : Selected papers, sous la direction de Partee, Barbara H., 59107. Indiana : Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. The normal course of events. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L.-S, Huang, C.-T. James, Li, Y.-H. Audrey, et Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1997. Causative compounds across Chinese dialects : A study of Cantonese, Mandarin and Taiwanese. Chinese Languages and Linguistics (4) : 199224.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida et Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam. 2004. The syntax of time adverbs. Dans The syntax of time, sous la direction de Jacqueline Guéron et Jacqueline Lecarme, 143179. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague's PTQ. Dordrecht : D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hitzeman, Janet. 1997. Semantic partition and the ambiguity of sentences containing temporal adverbials. Natural Language Semantics 5(2) : 87100.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. Phrase structure, lexical integrity, and Chinese compounds. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 19(2) : 5378.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1991. On verb movement and some syntax-semantics mismatches in Chinese. Dans Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium of Chinese Language and Linguistics. Taipei : Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Huang, C-T James. 1994a. More on Chinese word order and parametric theory. Dans Syntactic theory and first language acquisition : Cross-linguistic perspectives – volume 1 : Phrase structure, sous la direction de Barbara Lust, Margarita Suner, John Whitman, Gabriella Hermon, et Jaklin Kornfilt, 1535. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1994b. Verb movement and some syntax-semantics mismatches in Chinese. Chinese Languages and Linguistics (2) : 587613.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Partitive case and aspect. Dans The projection of arguments, sous la direction de Miriam Butt et Wilhelm Geuder, 265307. Stanford USA : CSLI.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. Dans Semantics and contextual expression, sous la direction de Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem, et Peter van Emde Boas, 75115. Dordrecht : Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. Dans Lexical matters, sous la direction de Ivan Sag et Anna Szabolcsi, 29–53. Stanford, CA : CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1998. The origins of telicity. Dans Events and grammar, sous la direction de Susan Rothstein, 197235. Dordrecht : Kluwer.Google Scholar
Landman, Fred et Rothstein, Susan. 2010. Incremental homogeneity in the semantics of aspectual for-phrases. Dans Lexical semantics, syntax and event structure, sous la direction de Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron, et Ivy Sichel, 229251. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Landman, Fred et Rothstein, Susan. 2012a. The felicity of aspectual for-phrases, part 1 : homogeneity. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(2) : 8596.Google Scholar
Landman, Fred et Rothstein, Susan. 2012b. The felicity of aspectual for-phrases, part 2 : incremental homogeneity. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(2) : 97112.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. et Thompson, Sandra A.. 1981. Mandarin Chinese : A functional reference grammar. Berkeley : University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Hui-Ju Grace. 2002. Ellipsis constructions in Chinese. Thèse de doctorat, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1987. Duration phrases : distributions and interpretations. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 22(3) : 2765.Google Scholar
Lin, Jo-Wang. 2007. Event decomposition and the syntax and semantics of Chinese durative phrases. Dans Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, sous la direction de Johannes Dölling, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow, et Martin Schäfer, 3154. Berlin : de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Jonathan E. 2006. The syntax of inner aspect. Thèse de doctorat, Stony Brook University.Google Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop. 1990. The A/A’ distinction and movement theory. Thèse de doctorat, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Moens, Marc et Steedman, Mark. 1988. Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14(2) : 1528.Google Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike. 1991. Measure adverbials. Linguistics and Philosophy 14(6) : 629660.Google Scholar
Morzycki, Marcin. 2004. Measure DP adverbials : measure phrase modification in VP. Ms., UQAM.Google Scholar
Pan, Haihua et Ye, Kuang. 2015. Liheci he tongyuan binyu jiegou [Mots séparables et objets internes en chinois mandarin]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Linguistique Contemporaine] 17(3) : 304319.Google Scholar
Paris, Marie-Claude. 1988. Durational complements and verb copying in Chinese. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 28(2) : 423439.Google Scholar
Peck, Jeeyoung. 2011. Analogy and reanalysis in the postposing of durative and iterative adverbials in the history of Chinese. Dans Proceedings of the 23rd North American Conference on Chinese Lingusitics, sous la direction de Jing-Schmidt Zhuo, vol. 1, 65–83.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian Catriona. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon : A first phase syntax. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring events : A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Oxford : Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shi, Dingxu. 2006. Dongci hou shuliang duanyu de jüfa diwei [Sur le statut syntaxique des expressions numérales postverbales]. Hanyu Xuebao [Linguistique Chinoise] 1 : 5158.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1994. Aspectual viewpoint and situation type in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3(2) : 107146.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht : Kluwer, 2e éd.Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriette. 1998. Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16(2) : 347385.Google Scholar
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 2001. Functional projections and adverbial expressions in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 2(2) : 203241.Google Scholar
Teng, Shou-Hsin. 1975. Predicate movements in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 3(1) : 6075.Google Scholar
Thompson, Ellen. 2006. The structure of bounded events. Linguistic Inquiry 37(2) : 211228.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 2010. Inner aspect : The articulation of VP. Dordrecht : Springer.Google Scholar
Van Geenhoven, Veerle. 2004. For-adverbials, frequentative aspect, and pluractionality. Natural Language Semantics 12(2) : 135190.Google Scholar
Verkuyl, Henk J. 1972. On the compositional nature of the aspects. Berlin : Springer.Google Scholar
Zucchi, Sandro et White, Michael. 2001. Twigs, sequences and the temporal constitution of predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 24(2) : 223270.Google Scholar