Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:19:47.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impaired Incentive Learning in Treated Parkinson’s Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

D. Charbonneau ,
R.J. Riopelle  and
R.J. Beninger
D. Charbonneau
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology, Queen’s University, Kingston
R.J. Riopelle
Affiliation:
Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston
R.J. Beninger*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston
*
Department of Psychology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Objective: To quantify the performance of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) in incentive learning, or learning to respond to stimuli that signal the imminent presentation of a reinforcer, and in paired-associate learning, or learning of word associations. Methods: The performance of 32 patients with idiopathic PD was compared to that of 25 healthy control subjects, and 32 subjects suffering from arthritis, matched for age and education. The PD and arthritic groups were comparable on a self-report measure of physical disability. All subjects were physically capable of satisfying the contingencies of the incentive learning task. The avoidance task that quantified incentive learning used money loss as an aversive stimulus. The word paired-associate learning task was presented on a computer and feedback was not given on performance. Results: The normal and arthritic groups performed equally well on the avoidance task, whereas the PD group was impaired despite dopaminergic replacement therapy. The groups did not differ significantly in paired-associate learning. Conclusions: These findings are among the first to suggest that the nigrostriatal dopamine dysfunction associated with PD may play a role in incentive learning but not in paired-associate learning and are consistent with a role for dopamine in certain forms of learning and memory. The findings may highlight differences between tonic and modulated function in the nigrostriatal system.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , November 1996 , pp. 271 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1996

References

1.Beninger, RJ.The role of dopamine in locomotor activity and learning. Brain Res Rev 1983; 6: 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Beninger, RJ.Role of D, and D2 receptors in learning. In: Waddington, J., ed. Dopamine Receptor Interactions. London: Acadmic Press, 1993; 115–157.Google Scholar
3.Anisman, H, Irwin, J, Zacharko, RM, Tombaugh, TH.Effects of dopamine receptor blockade on avoidance performance: assessment of effects on cue-shock and response-outcome associations. Behav Neural Biol 1982; 36: 280–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Beninger, RJ.Methods for determining the effects of drugs on learning. In: Boulton, AA, Baker, GB, Greenshaw, AJ, eds. Neuro-Methods, Volume 13: Psychoparmacol. Clifton: The Humana Press, 1989: 623–685.Google Scholar
5.Fibiger, HC.The neurobiological substrates of depression in Parkinson’s disease: a hypothesis. Can J Neurol Sci 1984; 11: 105–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Beninger, RJ, D’Amico, CM, Ranaldi, R.Microinjections of flupenthixol into the caudate-putamen of rats produce intrasession declines in food-rewarded operant responding. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1993; 45: 343–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Beninger, RJ, Ranaldi, R.Microinjections of flupenthixol into the caudate-putamen but not the nucleus accumbens, amygdala or frontal cortex of rats produce intra-session declines in food-rewarded operant responding. Behav Brain Res 1993; 55: 203–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Koob, GF, Simon, H, Herman, JP, LeMoal, M.Neuroleptic-like disruption of the conditioned avoidance response requires destruction of both the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopamine systems. Brain Res 1984; 303: 319–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Cutmore, TRH, Beninger, RJ.Do neuroleptics impair learning in schizophrenic patients? Schiz Res 1990; 3: 173–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Fantie, BD, Kosmidis, MH 1994. Avoidance responding and closed-head injury: replication and reevaluation of the “anticipatory behaviour deficit”. Clin Neuropsychol 1995; 8: 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Weiner, H.Response cost and the aversive control of human operant behavior. J Exp Anal Behav 1963; 6: 415–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Weiner, H.Modification of escape responding in humans by increasing the magnitude of an aversive event. J Exp Anal Behav 1964; 7: 277–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Beninger, RJ.The role of serotonin and dopamine in learning to avoid aversive stimuli. In: Archer, T and Nilsson, LG, eds. Aversion, Avoidance and Anxiety: Perspectives on Aversively Motivated Behaviour. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, 1989: 265–284.Google Scholar
14.Salmon, DP, Butters, N.Neurobiology of skill and habit learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1995; 5: 184–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Squire, LR.Declarative and nondeclarative memory: multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. J Cog Neurosci 1992; 4: 232–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Phillips, AG, Carr, GD.Cognition and the basal ganglia: a possible substrate for procedural knowledge. Can J Neurol Sci 1987; 14: 381–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Robbins, TW.Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and Parkinson’s disease: neural basis and the role of dopamine. In: Willner, P, Scheel-Kruger, J, eds. The Mesolimbic Dopamine System: From Motivation to Action. Chichester: Wiley & Sons, 1991: 497–528.Google Scholar
18.Fischman, MW, Schuster, CR.The effects of chlorpromazine and pentobarbital on behavior maintained by electric shock of point loss avoidance in humans. Psychopharmacol 1979; 66: 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Fischman, MW, Smith, RC, Schuster, CR.Effects of chlorpromazine on avoidance and escape responding in humans. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1976; 4: 11–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Kokmen, E, Smith, GE, Petersen, RC, Tangalos, E, Ivnik, RC.The short test of mental status: correlations with standardized psychometric testing. Arch Neurol 1991; 48: 725–728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Koller, WC.Disturbance of recent memory function in Parkinsonian patients on anticholinergic therapy. Cortex. 1984; 30: 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Huber, SJ, Freidenberg, DL, Shuttleworth, EC, Paulson, GW, Christy, JA.Neuropsychological impairments associated with severity of Parkinson’s disease. J Neuropsychol Clin Neurosci. 1989; I: 154–158.Google Scholar
23.Pillon, B, Dubois, B, Ploska, A, Agid, Y.Severity and specificity of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, and Parkinson’s diseases and progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology. 1991; 41: 634–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Allain, H, Lieury, A, Quemener, V, et al. Procedural memory and Parkinson’s Disease. Dementia 1995; 6: 174–178.Google ScholarPubMed
25.Gotham, AM, Brown, RG, Marsden, CD.Depression in Parkinson’s disease: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986; 49: 381–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Brown, RG, MacCarthy, B, Jahanshahi, J, Marsden, CD.Accuracy of self-reported disability in patients with Parkinsonism. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 955–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Ehmann, TS, Beninger, RJ, Gawel, MJ, Riopelle, RJ.Depressive symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: a comparison with disabled control subjects. J Geriat Psychiat Neurol 1990; 5: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Hoehn, MM, Yahr, MD.Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology 1967; 17: 427–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Fahn, S, Marsden, CD, Jenner, P, Teychenne, P.Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease. New York: Raven Press, 1987.Google Scholar
30.Underwood, BJ.Paired associate learning: data on pair difficulty. Mem Cog 1982; 10: 610–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Mohr, E, Juncos, J, Cox, C, et al. Selective deficits in cognition and memory in high-functioning Parkinsonian patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53: 603–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Taylor, AE, Saint-Cyr, JA, Lang, AE.Frontal lobe dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 1986; 109: 845–883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Taylor, AE, Saint-Cyr, JA, Lang, AE.Cognitive changes in relation to treatment response. Brain 1987; 110: 35–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Karayanidis, F.Parkinson’s disease: a conceptualization of neuropsychological deficits within an information-processing framework. Biol Psychol 1989; 29: 149–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Pillon, B, Dubois, B, Cusimano, G, et al. Does cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease result from non-dopaminergic lesions? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989; 52: 201–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Freeman, JS, Cody, FWJ, Schady, W.The influence of external timing cues upon the rhythm of voluntary movements in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993; 56: 1078–1084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Romo, R, Schultz, W.Dopamine neurons of the monkey midbrain: contingencies of responses to active touch during self-initiated arm movements. J Neurophysiol 1990; 63: 592–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Divac, I, Oberg, GE, Rosenkilde, CE.Patterned neural activity: implications for neurology and neuropharmacology. In: Schneider, FS, Lidsky, TI, eds. Basal Ganglia and Behavior: Sensory Aspects of Motor Functioning. Toronto: Hans Huber Publishers, 1987: 61–67.Google Scholar
39.Heindel, WC, Salmon, DP, Shults, CW, Walicke, PA, Butters, N.Neuropsychological evidence for multiple implicit memory systems: a comparison of Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, and Parkinson’s Disease patients. J Neurosci 1989; 9: 582–587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Saint-Cyr, JA, Taylor, AE, Lang, AE.Procedural learning and neostriatal dysfunction in man. Brain 1988; 111: 941–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Squire, LR, Zola-Morgan, S.Memory: brain systems and behavior. Trend Neurosci 1988; 11: 170–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Franklin, KBJ, McCoy, SN.Pimozides-induced extinction in rats: stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1979; 11: 71–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Murrell, S, Himmelfarb, S, Schulte, P, Norris, F.Pretest of candidate measures: results and final decision. Louisville: University of Urban Studies Center, 1985.Google Scholar