P.009 Long-term comparative efficacy of inebilizumab from N-MOmentum participants versus azathioprine and immunosuppressants and placebo in NMOSD patients

Abstract

Background: Long-term efficacy of inebilizumab (INEB), an anti-CD19+ B cell-depleting antibody approved for the treatment of seropositive-aquaporin-4-antibody (AQP4+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) was evaluated over N-MOmentum (NCT02200770) open-label period (OLP) vs azathioprine and other immunosuppressants (AZA/IST) and vs PBO. Methods: Two historical comparator groups (HCGs), AZA/IST (N=132) and PBO (N=106), derived from published NMOSD studies, were used to compare efficacy of INEB (N=208) over the OLP. Hazard ratios (HR) for INEB vs HCGs were estimated using Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression. Time to NMOSD attack was analysed using parametric and flexible survival (spline) models. Results: Time to NMOSD attack for N-MOmentum PBO compared to PBO was HR 1.15;(95% CI:0.67–1.91; P=0.58). The HRs for time to NMOSD attack for INEB vs AZA/IST and PBO groups were 0.29(95% CI:0.17, 0.42; P<0.001) and 0.15 (95% CI:0.10, 0.21; P<0.001). At 4 years, estimated attack-free survival was 77% (95% CI:71, 83) for INEB, 36% (95% CI:27, 46) for AZA/IST, and 12% (95% CI:7, 20) for PBO. Conclusions: INEB was associated with a statistically significant reduction in risk of an NMOSD attack and provided a long-term attack-free probability over the OLP compared to the relative short-term benefit observed with AZA/IST.