Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:25:02.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Ideology Divides Generations: The 2002 and 2004 South Korean Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2008

Won-Taek Kang
Won-Taek Kang*
Affiliation:
Soongsil University
*
Won-Taek Kang, Department of Political Science, Soongsil University, Sangdo-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 156-743, Korea, kangwt@ssu.ac.kr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. An interesting phenomenon in recent South Korean electoral politics is the generation gap. In the 2002 presidential and the 2004 National Assembly elections, voting behaviour was sharply split between different age groups. A main question of this article is to figure out the underlying characteristics of the generational differences in the two elections and of the ideological division in the South Korean context. Findings show that the generation gap reflects different assessments of the authoritarian period and its inheritance. Young voters took a libertarian view and a negative assessment of the authoritarian era, while older voters, especially in their fifties and older, had a positive attitude toward the authoritarian legacies. Roh Moo-hyun's victory was largely attributed to his successful mobilization of young voters' generational rebellion.

Résumé. Un des phénomènes intéressants dans la vie politique électorale sud-coréenne concerne les différences de générations. Les groupes d'âge différents ont montré un comportement électoral différencié dans les élections présidentielles de 2002 et les législatives de 2004. L'interrogation majeure de cet article est de trouver les principales caractéristiques des différences générationnelles dans les deux élections, ainsi que les clivages idéologiques dans le contexte sud-coréen. Les résultats de cette étude montrent que les différences générationnelles reflètent celles du jugement sur la période du régime autoritaire et de ses héritages. Les jeunes électeurs possèdent une vision libertaire et un jugement négatif sur la période du régime autoritaire, tandis que les électeurs plus âgés, notamment ceux qui ont plus de 50 ans, font preuve d'une attitude positive sur les héritages de la période autoritaire. La victoire de Roh Moo-hyun s'explique en grande partie par la mobilisation réussie de la révolte générationnelle de jeunes électeurs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 461 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartle, John. 1998. “Left-Right Position Matters, but Does Social Class? Causal Models of the 1992 British General Election.” British Journal of Political Science 28(3): 501–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, Ivor. 1993. “Voting and the Electorate.” In Developments in British Politics 4, ed. Gamble, Andrew, Holliday, Ian, Dunleavy, Patrick and Peele, Gillian. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Low.Google Scholar
Henn, Matt, Weinstein, Mark and Wring, Dominic. 2002. “A generation apart? Youth and political participation in Britain.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4(2): 167–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1987. “Value Change in Industrial Societies.” American Political Science Review 81(4): 1289–2303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, David. 2002. Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Won-Taek. 1998. “The Rise of a Third Party in South Korea: The Unification National Party in the 1992 National Assembly Election.” Electoral Studies 17(1): 95–110.Google Scholar
Kang, Won-Taek. 2003. Electoral Politics in South Korea: Ideology, Region, Generation and Mass Media. Seoul: Pureungil. [in Korean]Google Scholar
Kim, Byung-Kook. 2000. “Party Politics in South Korea's Democracy: The Crisis of Success.” In Consolidating Democracy in South Korea, ed. Diamond, L. and Kim, B-K. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Kim, Jae-On and Mueller, Charles. 1994. “Introduction to Factor Analysis: What it is and how to do it.” In Factor Analysis and Related Techniques, ed. Lewis-Beck, M.. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kim, Man-Heum. 2003. “The 2002 Presidential Election and Regionalism.” In Electoral Process and Messages of the 2002 Presidential Election, ed. Kim, Se-Kyun. Seoul: Seoul National University Press. [in Korean]Google Scholar
Kwak, Jin Young. 2003. “The Party-State Liaison in Korea: Searching for Evidence of the Cartelized System.” Asian Perspective 27(1): 109–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Hong Yung. 2003. “South Korea in 2002.” Asian Survey 43(1): 64–77.Google Scholar
Moon, Katharine. 2003. “Korean Nationalism, Anti-Americanism, and Democratic Consolidation.” In Korea's Democratization, ed. Kim, Samuel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
“President Roh, the National Security Law must be abolished.” 2004. JoongAng Ilbo (Seoul), September 6, p. 1.Google Scholar
Sanders, David. 1999. “The Impact of Left-Right Ideology.” In Critical Elections: British Voters and Parties in Long-term Perspective, ed. Evans, G. and Norris, P.. London: Sage.Google Scholar
“The Ghost of Park Chung Hee.” 2004. JoongAng Daily (Seoul) August 5. http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2451316 (March 11, 2006).Google Scholar
“Top Policymakers Not on Same Wavelength.” 2004. Korea Times (Seoul), August 13. http://search.hankooki.com/times/times_view.php?terms=leftist+code%3A+kt&path=hankooki3%2Ftimes%2Flpage%2F200408%2Fkt2004081316330910220.htm (March 22, 2006).Google Scholar
Walker, Scott and Kang, Kyung-Tae. 2004. “The Presidential Election in South Korea, December 2002.” Electoral Studies 23 (4): 840–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Young Power Changes the Society.” 2002. JoongAng Ilbo (Seoul), December 21, p. 5.Google Scholar
“Young Power Revolution.” 2002. Hankook Ilbo (Seoul), December 24. http://www4.hankooki.com/nation/200212/h2002122319573214510.htm (April 10, 2006).Google Scholar