Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:07:10.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canadian Cyberparties: Reflections on Internet-Based Campaigning and Party Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2007

Tamara A. Small
Tamara A. Small
Affiliation:
Mount Allison University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Canadian political parties have been using the Internet as a campaign tool since the 1997 election. Rebuilding Canadian Party Politics by Carty, Cross and Young (2000) presents one of the first analyses of Internet-based communications during a Canadian election. It is also one of the most important assessments of Canadian party systems. The book outlines the components that characterize the fourth party system, which they argue, began after the 1993 election. Regionalization is the defining characteristic of this emerging system. The book argues that the Internet, like other communication technologies, is important in this latest party system. Consistent with the notion of regionalized campaign communications, the authors suggest that Canadian political parties use the Internet to target campaign messages to different regional and sociodemographic groups and enter into private conversations with voters. Using original data collected from the 2004 federal election, this paper reflects on these claims. The paper builds the case that the use of the Internet as a campaign tool is not consistent with their argument. Internet-based campaign communications in Canada by the major parties is neither regionalized nor targeted. Rather, this technology makes campaign communication more transparent and centralized.

Résumé. Au Canada, les partis politiques utilisent Internet comme outil de campagne depuis l'élection de 1997. Rebuilding Canadian Party Politics, par Carty, Cross et Young (2000), présente l'une des premières analyses des communications sur Internet pendant une campagne électorale. Il constitue aussi l'une des plus importantes évaluations des systèmes des partis politiques canadiens. Le livre dégage également les éléments qui caractérisent le système à quatre partis qui est né, selon eux, après l'élection de 1993. La régionalisation est la caractéristique déterminante de ce nouveau système. Le livre soutient qu'Internet, comme les autres technologies de communication, est important pour ce nouveau système à quatre partis. Conformément à la notion de communications de campagne régionalisées, les auteurs suggèrent que les partis politiques canadiens utilisent Internet pour cibler les messages de campagne selon les différents groupes régionaux et sociodémographiques et engager des conversations privées avec les électeurs. Le présent article examine ces affirmations à partir des données recueillies lors de l'élection fédérale de 2004. Il établit que l'utilisation d'Internet comme outil de campagne ne cadre pas avec leur argument. Les campagnes de communication sur Internet menées par les principaux partis au Canada ne sont ni régionalisées ni ciblées. Cette technologie rend plutôt les communications des campagnes électorales plus transparentes et plus centralisées.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 639 - 657
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alper, Donald K. 2000. “Rebuilding Canadian Party Politics” (book review). American Review of Canadian Studies 30: 572.Google Scholar
Barney, Darin. 2005. Communication Technology. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Bimber, Bruce. 1999. “The Internet and citizen communication with government: Does the medium matter?” Political Communication 16: 409–28.Google Scholar
Bimber, Bruce A. and Richard Davis. 2004. Campaigning Online: The Internet in US Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carlson, Tom and Göran Djupsund. 2001. “Old Wine in New Bottles? The 1999 Finnish Election Campaign on the Internet.” Harvard Journal of Press/Politics 6: 68–87.Google Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth. 2001. “Three Canadian Party Systems: An Interpretation of the Development of National Politics.” In Party Politics in Canada, 8th Edition, ed. Hugh G. Thorburn and Alan Whitehorn. Toronto: Prentice Hall.
Carty, R. Kenneth, William Cross and Lisa Young. 2000. Rebuilding Canadian Party Politics. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Clarkson, Stephen. 2001. “The Liberal Threepeat: The Multi-System Party in the Multi-Party System.” In The Canadian General Election of 2000, ed. John H. Pammett and Christopher Dornan. Toronto: Dundurn.
Clarkson, Stephen. 2005. “Disaster and Recovery: Paul Martin as Political Lazarus.” In The Canadian General Election of 2004, ed. John H. Pammett and Christopher Dornan. Toronto: Dundurn.
Coleman, Stephen and Nicola Hall. 2001. “Spinning on the Web: E-campaigning and Beyond.” In 2001: Cyberspace Odyssey: The Internet in the UK Election, ed. Stephen Coleman. London: Hansard Society. http://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/cyberodyssey.htm (June 1, 2003).
Cross, Bill. 2002. “The Increasing Importance of Region to Canadian Election Campaigns.” In Regionalism and Party Politics in Canada, ed. Lisa Young and Keith Archer. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, Faron and Peter Woolstencroft. 2005. “New Conservatives, Old Realities: The 2004 Election Campaign.” In The Canadian General Election of 2004, ed. John H. Pammett and Christopher Dornan. Toronto: Dundurn.
Gagnon, Alain G. and Jacque Hérivault. 2005. “The Bloc Québécois: The Dynamics of the Distinct Electorate.” In The Canadian General Election of 2004, ed. John H. Pammett and Christopher Dornan. Toronto: Dundurn.
Gibson, Rachel and Stephen Ward. 2000. “A Proposed Methodology for Studying the Function and Effectiveness of Party and Candidate Web Sites.” Social Science Computer Review 18: 301–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Rachel and Stephen Ward. 2002. “Virtual Campaigning: Australian Parties and the Impact of the Internet.” Australian Journal of Political Science 37: 99–127.Google Scholar
Guha, Arnie. 2004. “Of Websites and Windmills.” http://www.cbc.ca/canadavotes/thecampaign/aguha210604.html (May 30, 2005).
Hébert, Chantal. 2004. “Watching paint dry with hypercautious Harper.” The Toronto Star, May 28, 2004: A.23.
Howard, Philip N. 2005. “Deep Democracy, Thin Citizenship: Digital Media and the Production of Political Culture.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 597: 153–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, Emilienne and Phil Tajitsu Nash. 2001. Winning Campaigns Online: Strategies for Candidates and Causes, Second Edition. Bethesda, MD: Science Writers, Inc.
Kippen, Grant. 2000. The Use of Information Technologies by a Political Party. Vancouver: SFU-UBC Centre for the Study of Government Business.
Lapp, Miriam. 2002. “Rebuilding Canadian Party Politics” (book review). Canadian Journal of Political Science 35: 631–32.Google Scholar
March, Luke. 2004. “Russian Parties and the Political Internet.” Europe-Asia Studies 56: 369–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Michael, David Resnick and Jonathan Levy. 2003. “Major Parties Dominate, Minor Parties Struggle: US elections and the Internet.” In Political Parties and the Internet Net Gain? ed. Rachel Gibson, Paul Nixon and Stephen Ward. London: Routledge.
Meisel, John. 2001. “Review Article.” Government and Opposition 36: 423–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, Ananda and Cohen, Elisia. 1999. “Analyzing the Web: Directions and Challenges.” In Doing Internet Research: Critical issues and Methods for Examining the Net, ed. Steve Jones. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Morris, Dick. 1999. Vote.com. Los Angeles, CA: Renaissance Books.
Nevitte, Neil, Andre Blais, Elizabeth Gidengil and Richard Nadeau. 2000. Unsteady State: The 1997 Canadian Federal Election. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Rodgers, Jayne. 2003. Spatializing International Politics: Analysing Activism on the Internet. London: Routledge.
Small, Tamara A. 2004. “parties@canada: The Internet and the 2004 Cyber-Campaign.” In The Canadian General Election of 2004, ed. Jon H. Pammett and Christopher Doran. Toronto: Dundurn Press.
Small, Tamara A., David Taras and Dave Danchuk. 2005. From Electronic Brochures to E-campaigning: Party Web Sites during the 2004 Canadian Federal Election. Paper presented at The American Footprint: The Impact of US Technology and Technology Policy on the World, Duke University, North Carolina.
Small, Tamara A. 2006. “elections.ca: Canadan political parties and candidates on the net. A case study of the 2004 cybe-campaign.” Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Political Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
Taras, David. 1990. The Newsmakers: The Media's Influence on Canadian Politics. Scarborough, ON: Nelson Canada.
Whitehorn, Alan. 2005. “Jack Layton and the NDP: Gains but No Breakthrough.” In The Canadian General Election of 2004, ed. John H. Pammett and Christopher Dornan. Toronto: The Dundurn Group.
Zittel, Thomas. 2004. “Political Communication and Electronic Democracy.” In Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases and Challenges, ed. Frank Esser and Barbara Pfetsch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.