Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T23:04:00.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on the Theory of Nationalism as a Function of Ethnic Demands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

James Lightbody
James Lightbody
Affiliation:
Queen's University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , September 1969 , pp. 327 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1969

References

* The author wishes to acknowledge the initial suggestions of Professors Khayyam Paltiel and Kenneth McRae of Carleton University in whose seminar on nationalism these thoughts were, with trepidation, first advanced.

1 The Idea of Nationalism (New York, 1951), 10.

2 The Shaping of the Modern Mind (New York, 1953), 151.

3 Essays on Nationalism (New York, 1926), 5–6.

4 Nationalism (New York, 1961), 139.Google ScholarPubMed

5 Ibid., 140.

6 Marxism and the National Question (Moscow, 1950), 16.

7 Barker, Ernest, National Character and the Factors in Its Formation (London, 1927), 17.Google Scholar

8 (Cambridge, Mass., 1955), 2.

9 Kautsky, John, Political Change in Underdeveloped Countries: Nationalism and Communism (New York, 1962), 30.Google Scholar

10 Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism, Report: General Introduction (Ottawa, 1967), xxiv.Google ScholarPubMed

11 (Cambridge, Mass., 1953), 104.

12 state and Nation (London, 1964), 33.

13 “Nation-Building in Africa,” in Deutsch, K. and Foltz, W. J., eds., Nation-Building (New York, 1963), 106.Google Scholar

14 The work of David Truman, Earl Latham, and subsequent interest group analysts, for example, is important in suggesting the basis for the mobilizing of effective interest activity. Thus see Truman, , The Governmental Process (New York, 1951)Google Scholar, and Latham, , The Group Basis of Politics (Ithaca, 1952).Google Scholar

15 Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sidney, The Civic Culture (Boston, 1963), 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Riker, William, Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance (Boston, 1964), 7.Google Scholar

17 “Nation and World,” a paper delivered to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 9, 1966, p. 2. The italics are added.

18 Political Unification (New York, 1965), 25.

19 Edelman, Murray, The Symbolic Uses of Politics (Urbana, 1964), 167.Google Scholar

20 Lane, Robert, Political Ideology (New York, 1962), 381–99Google Scholar; Lane, Robert and Sears, David, Public Opinion (Englewood Cliffs, 1964), 40.Google Scholar Both discussions, while not necessarily in this context, emphasize the significance of loyalty to social groupings in providing a focus of orientation for individuals in a society. The impact of primary loyalty to a familiar ethnic group in an unfamiliar “host society” cannot be overemphasized in a discussion of that group's bargaining power.