Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T22:36:17.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply: Thinking Through Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Ian Box
Ian Box
Affiliation:
Mount Allison University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comment/Commentaire
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 355 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cooper, Barry “A Imperio usque ad Imperium: The Political Thought of George Grant,” in Larry Schmidt(ed.),George Grant in Process (Toronto: Anansi, 1978), 23.Google Scholar

2 On the connection between love of one's own and love of the good, see Grant's, essay “Canadian Fate and Imperialism,” in Technology and Empire (Toronto: Anansi, 1969), 73–78Google Scholar; and the conversation in George Grant in Process, 104-05.

3 Grant, George, Time as History (Toronto: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 1966), 48.Google ScholarPubMed

4 For a good discussion of this kind of dogmatic taking of sides, see Part 2 of Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil, particularly “aphorisms” 24, 31 and 34.

5 Contrast this decision with Strauss's conscious “retreat from the stage of literary glory” described in Allan Bloom's tribute to him in Political Theory 2 (1974), 387-89.

6 Eli Mandel mentions this problem of the relation of polemic to theory in Grant's work in “Grant, George: Language, Nation, The Silence of God,” Canadian Literature 83 (1979), 164.Google Scholar

7 Grant, George, Lament for a Nation (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1970), x.Google Scholar

8 Grant, George, English-Speaking Justice (Sackville, N. B.: Mount Allison University, 1974), 1.Google Scholar

9 Grant, Technology and Empire, 137.

10 Particularly in the essay “Knowing and Making,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada (4th Series) 12 (1974), 59-67.

11 Grant, English-Speaking Justice, 68.

12 Grant, '“The Computer Does Not Impose on Us the Ways It Should be Used. '” in Rotstein, Abraham (ed.). Beyond Industrial Growth (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976), 130.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., 131.

14 See my Grant, “Georgeand the Embrace of Technology,” in this JOURNAL 15 (1982). 515.Google Scholar

15 Grant, English-Speaking Justice, 93.

16 Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Advantage and Disadvantage of History for Life, trans. Peter Preuss (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1980), 53; see also “aphorism” 224 of Beyond Good and Evil.

17 Much has been made of this aspect of Grant's work; see in particular Laurence Lampert, “The Uses of Philosophy in George Grant,” in George Grant in Process, 190-94.