Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T08:07:10.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Loneliness among Older Adults in the Netherlands, Italy, and Canada: A Multifaceted Comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

Theo van Tilburg ,
Betty Havens  and
Jenny de Jong Gierveld
Theo van Tilburg*
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Betty Havens
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
Jenny de Jong Gierveld
Affiliation:
NIAS, Wassenaar, The Netherlands
*
Requests for offprints should be sent to: / Les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à : Professor Dr. T.G. van Tilburg, Faculty of Social Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1081, NL-1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. (TG.van.Tilburg@fsw.vu.nl)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Loneliness is experienced in many cultures. To properly assess cross-cultural differences, attention should be paid to the level, determinants, and measurement of loneliness. However, cross-cultural studies have rarely taken into account more than one of these. Differences in the level of loneliness were hypothesized on the basis of national differences in partnership, kinship, and friendship, which were assumed to be related to cultural standards within a society. Differences were examined among married and widowed older adults aged 70 to 89 years living independently in the Netherlands (N = 1,847), Tuscany, Italy (N = 562), and Manitoba, Canada (N = 1,134). Loneliness was measured with an 11-item scale. The Manitobans were high on emotional loneliness and the Tuscans were high on social loneliness. Partner status excepted, the determinants were nearly the same across the three locations. Differential item functioning (DIF) related to the three locations was observed for most items. Interactions with gender and the availability of a partner relationship were observed.

Résumé

La solitude est une expérience commune à de nombreuses cultures. Pour évaluer correctement les différences transculturelles, il faut examiner le degré de solitude, ses déterminants et les méthodes de mesure employées. Toutefois, les études transculturelles prennent rarement en compte plus d'un seul de ces facteurs. Ici, l'auteur part de l'hypothèse que les différences enregistrées dans le degré de solitude reflètent les différences nationales face aux relations avec les partenaires, la famille et les amis, différences qu'il suppose liées aux normes culturelles de la société. L'étude porte sur les différences notées chez des aînés mariés et veufs âgés de 70 à 89 ans, qui vivent de façon autonome au Pays-Bas (N = 1847), en Toscane, Italie (N = 562) et au Manitoba, Canada (N = 1134). La solitude a été mesurée à l'aide d'une échelle à 11 items. Les Manitobains ont un score élevé pour la solitude affective et les Toscans pour la solitude sociale. Exception faite du statut civil, les déterminants sont presque identiques dans les trois régions étudiées. Pour la plupart des items, l'auteur examine le rôle du fonctionnement différencié des items (differential item functioning - DIF) dans les trois régions, les interactions avec le sexe et le fait que les sujets étudiés aient ou non un partenaire.

Keywords

aginglonelinessagedcross-cultural differencescultural test biasDIFvieillissementsolitudepersonne âgéedifférences transculturellespartialité du test culturelDIF
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 23 , Special Issue/Numéro special 2: Social Isolation and Loneliness/Isolement social et solitude , Summer/Été 2004 , pp. 169 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Camilli, G., & Congdon, P. (1999). Application of a method of estimating DIF for polytomous test items. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 323–341.Google Scholar
Chipperfield, J.G., Havens, B., & Doig, W. (1997). Methods and description of the Aging in Manitoba project: A twenty-year longitudinal study. Canadian Journal on Aging, 16, 606–625.Google Scholar
de Jong Gierveld, J. (1989). Personal relationships, social support, and loneliness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 197–221.Google Scholar
de Jong Gierveld, J., & Kamphuis, F.H. (1985). The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong Gierveld, J., & van Tilburg, T.G. (1991). Kwaliteitsbepaling van Meetinstrumenten via Triangulatie [Triangulation as method to assess the quality of measuring instruments]. In Swanborn, P.G., de Jong Gierveld, J., van Tilburg, T.G., Bronner, A.E., & Meijnen, G.W., Aspecten van Onderzoek: Theorie, Variabelen en Praktijk [Aspects of research: Theory, variables and practice] (pp. 29–64). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, Vakgroepen Planning, Organisatie en Beleid & Empirisch Theoretische Sociologie.Google Scholar
Ester, P., Halman, L., & de Moor, R. (Eds.) (1994). The individualizing society: Value change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R., Cook, O., & Yung, Y. (2001). Loneliness and life satisfaction among three cultural groups. Personal Relationships, 8, 225–230.Google Scholar
Havens, B., & Hall, M. (2001). Social isolation, loneliness and the health of older adults. Indian Journal of Gerontology, 14, 144–153.Google Scholar
Höllinger, F., & Haller, M. (1990). Kinship and social networks in modern societies: A cross-cultural comparison among seven nations. European Sociological Review, 6, 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D.P., & Mullins, L.C. (1987). Growing old and lonely in different societies: Toward a comparative perspective. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 2, 257–275.Google Scholar
Jylhä, M., & Jokela, J. (1990). Individual experiences as cultural: A cross-cultural study on loneliness among the elderly. Ageing and Society, 10, 295–315.Google Scholar
Knipscheer, C.P.M., de Jong Gierveld, J., van Tilburg, T.G., & Dykstra, P.A. (1995). Living arrangements and social networks of older adults. Amsterdam: VU University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, P., Hagberg, B., & Poon, L.W. (1997). Predictors of loneliness in centenarians: A parallel study. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 12, 203–224.Google Scholar
Peplau, L.A., & Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In Peplau, L.A. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 1–18). New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Rokach, A., Orzeck, T., Cripps, J., Lackovic-Grgin, K., & Penezic, Z. (2001). The effects of culture on the meaning of loneliness. Social Indicators Research, 53, 17–31.Google Scholar
Rokach, A., & Sharma, M. (1996). The loneliness experience in a cultural context. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 827–839.Google Scholar
Roznowski, M., & Reith, J. (1999). Examining the measurement quality of tests containing differentially functioning items: Do biased items result in poor measurement? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 248–269.Google Scholar
Russell, D.W., Peplau, L.A., & Cutrona, C.E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 471–480.Google Scholar
Stack, S. (1998). Marriage, family and loneliness: A cross-national study. Sociological Perspectives, 41, 415–432.Google Scholar
Stevens, N.L. (2001). Combating loneliness: A friendship enrichment programme for older women. Ageing and Society, 21, 183–202.Google Scholar
van Baarsen, B., Snijders, T.A.B., Smit, J.H., & van Duijn, M.A.J. (2001). Lonely but not alone: Emotional isolation and social isolation as two distinct dimensions of loneliness in older people. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Poortinga, Y.H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 29–37.Google Scholar
van Tilburg, T.G., de Jong Gierveld, J., Lecchini, L., & Marsiglia, D. (1998). Social integration and loneliness: A comparative study among older adults in the Netherlands and Tuscany, Italy. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 15, 740–755.Google Scholar
Vermunt, J.K., & Magidson, J. (2000). Latent Gold 2.0 user's guide. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations.Google Scholar
Weiss, R.S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar