Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:14:08.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptual Framework for Development of Long-Term Care Policy 2. Conceptual Model*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

François Béland  and
Delphine Arweiler
François Béland
Affiliation:
Université de Montreal
Delphine Arweiler
Affiliation:
Université de Montreal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Planning of long-term care (LTC) focusses on four themes: (1) developing priorities to reflect values; (2) setting up human service organizations governed by a set of rules and procedures; (3) choosing objectives to which participants and organizations are commited; (4) mobilizing resources. A conceptual scheme for LTC planning could draw on each of these four structural elements. But they might prove to be a set of separate concepts only linked to each other intuitively, unless they are linked through action processes. The total number of reciprocal relationships between the four planning elements is 12. We have therefore identified 12 different action processes to be examined whenever LTC planning is undertaken. These processes allow information from the four structural elements to circulate between them. For example, priority, organization and objectives are sources of information when choosing criteria for the allocation of resources. Thus the processes form bridges between the planning elements. These bridges must be used whenever planning is undertaken in order to ensure that all the elements are given equal weight. Whichever planning element is used as a starting point for LTC planning, the process knits the structural elements together into a whole. Using our conceptual scheme as a guide, planners can cover the whole field of LTC that it represents.

Résumé

La planification des services de longue durée (SLD) s'organise autour de quatre themes: (1) le développement d'un ordre de priorités qui referent au monde des valeurs, (2) la mise sur pied d'organisations de prestation de services régis par un ensemble de regies et de procedures, (3) le choix d'objectifs qui engagent les acteurs et les organisations et, (4) la mobilisation de ressources. Un schema conceptuel pour la planification des SLD peut emprunter à chacun de ces quatre elements structuraux. Mais ces elements risquent de rester qu'un ensemble de concepts plus ou moins disparates, plus ou moins lies entre eux de façon intuitive. Des processus d'action établissent des liens entre ces elements. Le nombre total de rapports possibles entre les quatre elements de la planification sont au nombre de 12, mais puisque ces quatre elements s'influencent mutuellement, les processus qui les unissent doivent refléter ce double mouvement. Nous avons done identifïé 12 différents processus qui doivent ètre examines dans tout effort de planification des SLD. Ces processus permettent à l'information contenue dans les quatre elements structuraux de circuler les uns vers les autres. Par exemple, les elements de priorité, d'organisation et d'objectifs sont des sources d'information pour le choix de critères d'allocation des ressources. Les processus construisent done des ponts entre les elements de la planification, des ponts qui doivent tous ètre empruntés dans toute demarche de planification pour assurer que tous les elements soient pris en consideration, sans que l'un soit négligé au profit d'un autre. Done, peu importe l'élément de la planification choisi comme point de depart dans un effort de planification des SLD, les processus unissent les elements structuraux en un tout. Notre schema conceptuel, s'il est utilise comme guide, permet de couvrir le champ des SLD, tout le champ qu'il a saisi.

Keywords

Long-Term CareConceptual FrameworkPlanningTheory of ActionSoins de longue duréeschema conceptuelplanificationactionalisme
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , Hiver/Winter 1996 , pp. 682 - 697
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberta Committee on Long-Term Care. (1988). A New Vision for Long Term Care, Meeting the Need. Edmonton: Committee pn Long Term Care for Senior Citizens.Google Scholar
Australia. Department of Health, Housing and Community Services. (1991). Mid-Term Review of the Aged Care Reform Strategy: Report. Canberra: AHGPS.Google Scholar
Béland, F., & Arweiler, D. (1996). Conceptual framework for development of long-term care policy 1. Constitutive elements. Canadian Journal on Aging, 15(A), 649–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, F., & Shapiro, E. (1993). Dix provinces appellent de leurs voeux la mëme politique de services de longue durée. Journal of Canadian Studies, 28, 166–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, H.I. (1982). Planning for Health: Generics for the eighties. New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
British Columbia Royal Commission on Health Care and Costs. (1991). Closer to Home. Vol. 2. Province of British Columbia.Google Scholar
British Columbia Task Force on Issues of Concern to Seniors. (1989). Toward a Better Age: Strategies for Improving the Lives of Senior British Columbians. Victoria: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
Donabedian, A. (1973). Aspects of Medical Care Administration: Specifying Requirements for Health Care. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. (1988). Community Care: Agenda for Action. A Report to the Secretary of State for Social Services. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Groupe d'experts sur les personnes ainées. (1991). Vers un nouvel équilibre des ages. Quebec: Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux.Google Scholar
Hollander, M.J. (1994). The Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Continuing Care Services in Canada. Ottawa: Queen's University of Ottawa Economics Projects.Google Scholar
INSERSO. (1992). Plan Gerontologico. Madrid: Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales, In-stituto Nacional de Servicios Sociales.Google Scholar
Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux. (1992a). The Policy on Health and Weil-Being. Quebec: Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux.Google Scholar
Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux. (1992b). Politique de services à domicile. Quebec: Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux.Google Scholar
New Brunswick. (1991). Promotion de l'autonomie des citoyens ainés. Bàtir pour l'avenir. Fredericton, NB: Santé et services communautaires. Bureau pour citoyens.Google Scholar
New Zealand. (1992). Support for Independence. New Zealand: Ministers of Health and Social Welfare.Google Scholar
Ontario. (1990). Strategies de réaménagement. Réforme globale des soins de longue durée en Ontario. Toronto: Ministry of Community and Social Services.Google Scholar
Ontario. (1991). Redirection of Long-term Care and Support Services in Ontario. Toronto: Ministry of Community and Social Services.Google Scholar
Ontario. (1993a). Partnerships in Long-term Care: A New Way to Plan, Manage and Deliver Services and Community Support, a policy framework. Toronto: Ministry of Health, Ministry of Community and Social Services, Ministry of Citizenship.Google Scholar
Ontario. (1993b). Partnerships in Long-term Care: A New Way to Plan, Manage and Deliver Services and Community Support, an implementation framework. Toronto: Ministry of Health, Ministry of Community and Social Services, Ministry of Citizenship.Google Scholar
Ontario. (1993c). Partnerships in Long-term Care: A New Way to Plan, Manage and Deliver Services and Community Support, Guidelines for the Establishment of Multi-service Agencies. Toronto: Ministry of Health, Ministry of Community and Social Services, Ministry of Citizenship.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1937). The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1977). Social structure and the symbolic media of interchange. In Parsons, T. (Ed.), Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory (pp. 204–228). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pineault, R., & Daveluy, C. (1986). La Planification de la santé. Montreal: Agence d'Arc.Google Scholar
Prince Edward Island. Ad hoc Committee on Aging. (1990). The Aging Impact Study. Prince Edward Island: Department of Health and Social Services.Google Scholar
Quebec. (1985). Un nouvel àge àprotéger, politique du ministère des Affaires sociales à l'égard des personnes àgées. Quebec: Gouvernement du Quebec, Ministère des Affaires sociales.Google Scholar
Rapport Rochon. (1988). Commission d'enquéte sur les services de santé et les services sociaux. Quebec: Les publications du Quebec.Google Scholar
Schopflin, P. (1991). Dépendance et solidarités: mieux aider les personnes àgées. Paris: La Documentation française.Google Scholar
Weissart, W.G., Cready, C.M., & Pawelak, J.E. (1989) Home and community care: three decades of findings. In Petersen, M.D. & White, D.L. (Eds.), Health Care of the Elderly (pp. 39–125). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar