Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:47:21.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fidélité de la traduction française de trois instruments d'évaluation des aidants naturels de malades déments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Réjean Hébert ,
Gina Bravo  and
Diane Girouard
Réjean Hébert
Affiliation:
Centre de recherche en gérontologie et gériatrie, Hôpital D'Youville de Sherbrooke*
Gina Bravo
Affiliation:
Centre de recherche en gérontologie et gériatrie, Hôpital D'Youville de Sherbrooke*
Diane Girouard
Affiliation:
Centre de recherche en gérontologie et gériatrie, Hôpital D'Youville de Sherbrooke*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Caregivers of demented patients are under significant stress along with physical, psychological or social problems. Standardized and validated instruments are required for measuring consequences of caregiving or efficacy of support interventions. Reliability of French translation of these instruments has to be verified in order to confirm their psychometric properties. The goal of the present study is to assess reliability of the French translation of three instruments designed for evaluation of caregivers of demented patients. The Zarit's Burden Interview (BI) is a 22-items scale measuring the subjective burden of the caregiver. The Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC), a 53 item scale, measures frequency of memory and behaviour problems of demented patients and the caregiver's reaction to these problems, which is another mean of burden assessment. The Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Test (ADKT) assesses knowledge of caregivers about demented diseases and resources available using 20 multiple choice questions. A reliability study was conducted on a sample of 40 caregivers. The caregivers were questioned twice, the second time after one (N = 26) or eight (N = 14) weeks. The BI internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) yielded a coefficient of 0.85 and test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient) was 0.89. The RMBPC's Cronbach Alpha was 0.93 for frequency and 0.94 for reaction. Intra-class correlation coefficients were 0.77 (frequency) and 0.90 (reaction) for RMBPC and 0.71 for ADKT.

Résumé

Les aidants naturels de malades déments subissent un stress considérable et présentent des problèmes tant physiques que psychologiques ou sociaux. Des instruments d'évaluation validés et standardisés sont nécessaires pour analyser les effets de la prise en charge de tels malades ou pour mesurer l'efficacité de programme de soutien aux aidants. La présente étude a pour objectif de vérifier la fidélité de la traduction française de trois instruments d'évaluation des aidants naturels de malades déments. Le Burden Interview (BI) de Zarit mesure en 22 items le fardeau subjectif de l'aidant. Le Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC) de Teri mesure la fréquence des problèmes de comportement et de mémoire présentés par le malade (53 items) de même que la réaction de l'aidant à ces problèmes, ce qui constitue une autre mesure du fardeau. Le Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Test (ADKT) évalue les connaissances de l'aidant sur la maladie et les ressources de soutien disponibles au moyen de 20 questions à choix multiples. L'étude de fidélité a été réalisée auprès de 40 aidants naturels qui ont complété les instruments à deux reprises à une (N = 26) et huit (N = 14) semaines d'intervalle. Le BI montre un coefficient de cohérence interne (de Cronbach) de 0,85 et de fidélité test-retest (coefficient intra-classe) de 0,89. Le RMBPC présente des α de 0,93 (fréquence) et 0,94 (réaction)et des coefficients intra-classe de 0,77 (fréquence) et 0,90 (réaction). Pour le ADKT, le coefficient de corrélation intra-classe s'élève à 0,71.

Keywords

Traduction françaisequestionnairefardeaudémenceaidants naturels.TranslationQuestionnaireBurdenDementiaCaregivers.
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , Fall/automne 1993 , pp. 324 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Baumgarten, M. (1989). The health of persons giving care to the demented elderly: a critical review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42(12), 1137–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo, G., & Potvin, L. (1991). Estimating the reliability of continuous measures with Cronbach's Alpha or the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient: toward the integration of two traditions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(4/5), 381–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chenoweth, B., & B., Spencer (1986). Dementia: the experience of frailty caregivers. The Gerontologist, 26, 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derogatis, L.R., Lipman, R.S., Covi, L., Richels, K, & Uhlenhuth, E.R. (1970). Dimensions of outpatient neurotic pathology: comparison of a clinical versus an empirical assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieckmann, L., Zarit, S.H., Zarit, J.M., & Gatz, M. (1988). The Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Test. The Gerontologist, 28(3), 402–07.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donner, A., & Eliaszim, M. (1987). Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 6, 441–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitting, M., Rabins, P., Lucas, M.J., & Eastham, J. (1986). Caregivers for dementing patients: a comparison of husbands and wives. The Gerontologist, 26, 248–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, J.L. (1985). The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New-York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gallagher, D., Rappaport, M., Benedict, A., Lovett, S., Silven, D., & Kraemer, H. (1985, November). Reliability of selected interview and self-report measures with family caregivers. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, New Orleans.Google Scholar
George, L.K., & Gwyther, L.P. (1986). Caregiver well-being: a multidimensional examination of family caregivers of demented adults. The Gerontologist, 26, 253–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haley, W., Brown, L., & Levine, E.G. (1987). Experimental evaluation of the effectiveness of group interventions for dementia caregivers. The Gerontologist, 27, 376–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorm, A.F., Korten, A.E., & Henderson, A.S. (1987). The prevalence of dementia: a quantitative integration of the literature. Ada Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 76, 465–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pratt, C., Schmall, V., & Wright, S. (1986). Family caregivers and dementia. Social Casework: the Journal of Contemporary Social Work, février, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharland, A.E. (1987). Relieving feelings of strain among women and elderly mothers. Psychology and Aging, 2, 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, R., Visintainer, P., & Williamson, G.M. (1990). Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of caregiving. Journal of Gerontology, 45(5), P181–P191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephens, M.A.P., & Kenney, J.M. (1989). Caregiving stress instruments: assessment of content and measurement quality. Gerontology Review, 2(1), 40–54.Google Scholar
Teri, L., Truax, P., Logsdon, R., Uomoto, J., & Zarit, S. (1992). Assessment of behavioral problems in dementia: the Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist. Psychology and Aging, 7, 622–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, E.H., & W., Doll (1982). The burden of families coping with the mentally ill: an invisible crisis. Family Relations, 31, 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toseland, R.W., & Rossiter, C.M. (1989). Group interventions to support family ca-regivers: a review and analysis. The Gerontologist, 29(A), 438–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallerand, R.J. (1989). Vers une méthodologie de validation transculturelle de questionnaires psychologiques: implications pour la recherche en langue française. Psychologie canadienne, 30(4), 662–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitaliano, P.P., Young, H.M., & Russo, J. (1991). Burden: a review of measures used among caregivers of individuals with dementia. The Gerontologist, 31(1), 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitlatch, C.J., Zarit, S.H., & Mack, W. (1986, November). Functional correlates of mental status tests. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America.Google Scholar
Zarit, J.M., & Zarit, S.H. (1982). Measuring burden and support in families with Alzheimer's disease elders. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Boston.Google Scholar
Zarit, S., Anthony, C., & Boutselis, M. (1987). Interventions with caregivers of dementia patients: A comparison of two approaches. Psychology and Aging, 2, 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarit, S.H., Orr, N.K., & Zarit, J.M. (1985). The hidden victims of Alzheimer's disease: families under stress. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Zarit, S.H., Reever, K.E., & Bach-Peterson, J. (1980). Relatives of impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. The Gerontologist, 20, 649–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zarit, S.H., & Zarit, J.M. (1982). Families under stress: interventions for caregivers of senile dementia patients. Psychotherapy: theory, research and practice, 19(4), 461–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarit, S.H., & Zarit, J.M. (1987). The Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist and the Burden Interview. Document technique, University Park, PA, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar