Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:06:37.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Telephone-Administered Cognitive Tests as Tools for the Identification of Eligible Study Participants for Population-Based Research in Aging*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

Christina Wolfson ,
Susan A. Kirkland ,
Parminder S. Raina ,
Jennifer Uniat ,
Karen Roberts ,
Howard Bergman ,
Linda Furlini ,
Amélie Pelletier ,
Geoff Strople  and
Camille L. Angus
...Show all authors
Christina Wolfson*
Affiliation:
Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University
Susan A. Kirkland
Affiliation:
Departments of Community Health & Epidemiology, and Medicine, Dalhousie University
Parminder S. Raina
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University
Jennifer Uniat
Affiliation:
Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre
Karen Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University
Howard Bergman
Affiliation:
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University
Linda Furlini
Affiliation:
Research Ethics Office, McGill University Health Centre
Amélie Pelletier
Affiliation:
Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre
Geoff Strople
Affiliation:
Departments of Community Health & Epidemiology, and Medicine, Dalhousie University
Camille L. Angus
Affiliation:
Departments of Community Health & Epidemiology, and Medicine, Dalhousie University
Homa Keshavarz
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University
Karen Szala-Meneok
Affiliation:
School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University
*
†Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: / La correspondance concernant cet article doit être adressées à : Christina Wolfson Division of Clinical Epidemiology McGill University Health Centre 1025 Pine Avenue West, Suite P2.028 Montreal, Qc H3A 1A1 Tel: 514-934-1934 extension 44739 christina.wolfson@mcgill.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As part of its recruitment process, the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) will face the challenge of screening out individuals who are sufficiently impaired in their ability to provide informed consent. In the process of developing the design of the CLSA, a review of the literature was performed with the goal of identifying currently existing telephone cognitive screening tools that can be used to identify eligible study participants for population-based research on aging. We identified 12 telephone screening tools, four of which were based on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and eight that were based on other face-to-face screening tools. Characteristics – including the constructs measured, the length of time for administration, the scoring/classification scheme, and any information regarding the validation of each tool – were extracted and summarized.

Résumé

Lors du processus de recrutement, l’Étude longitudinale canadienne sur le vieillissement (ÉLCV) fera face au défi d’identifier les individus qui ne possèdent pas suffisamment de compétences pour donner un consentement éclairé. Pendant le processus d’élaboration de l’ÉLCV, une revue de la littérature a été faite dans le but d’identifier les outils téléphoniques existants qui permettent le dépistage des déficits cognitifs et qui pourraient être utilisés pour identifier les participants éligibles pour une étude sur le vieillissement fondée sur la population. Nous avons identifié 12 outils téléphonique, quatre étaient basés sur l’examen de l’état mini-mental (MMSE) et huit étaient basés sur d’autres tests de dépistage de l’état cognitif administrés en personne. Les caractéristiques, incluant les items mesurés, le temps requis pour l’administration, le mode de pointage-classification, de même que toutes informations concernant la validation de chaque outil, ont été extraites et résumées.

Keywords

ÉLCVoutils de dépistage téléphoniquele dépistage cognitiveétude longitudinalerecrutementCLSAtelephone screening toolscognitive screeninglongitudinal studyrecruitment
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 28 , Issue 3: Special Issue on the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) , September 2009 , pp. 251 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Funding for the development of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Le Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec – Réseau québécois de recherche sur le vieillissement. Funding for this review was provided by a grant from Valorisation recherche Québec.

Parminder Raina holds a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Investigator award, an Ontario Premier’s Research Excellence award, and a Labarge Chair in Research and Knowledge Application for Optimal Aging. Howard Bergman is the Dr. Joseph Kaufmann Professor, Division of Geriatric Medicine at McGill University and Jewish General Hospital.

References

1.Kim, SYH, Caine, ED, Currier, GW, Leibovici, A, Ryan, JM. Assessing the competence of persons with Alzheimer’s disease in providing informed consent for participation in research. Am J Psychiatry 2001 May;158(5):712–17.Google Scholar
2.Royall, DR, Cordes, J, Polk, M. Executive control and the comprehension of medical information by elderly retirees. Exp Aging Res 1997 Oct-Dec;23(4):301–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Folstein, MF, Folstein, SE, McHugh, PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975 Nov;12(3):189–98.Google Scholar
4.Brodaty, H, Clarke, J, Ganguli, M, Grek, A, Jorm, AF, Khachaturian, Z, et al. . Screening for cognitive impairment in general practice: toward a consensus. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1998 Mar;12(1):1–13.Google Scholar
5.Cullen, B, O’Neill, B, Evans, JJ, Coen, RF, Lawlor, BA. A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007 Aug;78(8):790–99.Google Scholar
6.Roccaforte, WH, Burke, WJ, Bayer, BL, Wengel, SP. Validation of a telephone version of the mini-mental state examination. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992 Jul;40(7):697–702.Google Scholar
7.Norton, MC, Tschanz, JA, Fan, X, Plassman, BL, Welsh-Bohmer, KA, West, N, et al. . Telephone adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS). The Cache County Study. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1999 Oct;12(4):270–76.Google Scholar
8.Kawas, C, Karagiozis, H, Resau, L, Corrada, M, Brookmeyer, R. Reliability of the Blessed Telephone Information-Memory-Concentration Test. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1995 Oct;8(4):238–42.Google Scholar
9.Newkirk, LA, Kim, JM, Thompson, JM, Tinklenberg, JR, Yesavage, JA, Taylor, JL. Validation of a 26-point telephone version of the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2004 Jun;17(2):81–7.Google Scholar
10.Quail, J, Addona, V, Wolfson, C, Podoba, J, Lévesque, L, Dupuis, J. Association of unmet need with self-rated health in a community dwelling cohort of disabled seniors 75 years of age and over. Eur J Ageing 2007;4:45–55.Google Scholar
11.Lanska, DJ, Schmitt, FA, Stewart, JM, Howe, JN. Telephone-assessed mental state. Dementia 1993 Mar-Apr;4(2):117–19.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Brandt, J, Spencer, M, Folstein, MF. The telephone interview for cognitive status. Neuropsychiatr Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1988 Summer;1(2):111–17.Google Scholar
13.Crooks, V, Parsons, T, Buckwalter, JG. Validation of the Cognitive Assessment of Later Life Status (CALLS) instrument: a computerized telephonic measure. BMC Neurol 2007;7(1):10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Welsh, KAP, Breitner, JCSM, Magruder-Habib, KMP. Detection of dementia in the elderly using telephone screening of cognitive status. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1993 Apr;6(2):103–10.Google Scholar
15.Ferrucci, L, Del Lungo, I, Guralnik, JM, Bandinelli, S, Benvenuti, E, Salani, B, et al. . Is the telephone interview for cognitive status a valid alternative in persons who cannot be evaluated by the Mini Mental State Examination? Aging (Milano) 1998 Aug;10(4):332–38.Google Scholar
16.Beeri, MS, Werner, P, Davidson, M, Schmidler, J, Silverman, J. Validation of the modified telephone interview for cognitive status (TICS-m) in Hebrew. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2003 May;18(5):381–86.Google Scholar
17.Dal Forno, G, Chiovenda, P, Bressi, F, Ferreri, F, Grossi, E, Brandt, J, et al. . Use of an Italian version of the telephone interview for cognitive status in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006 Feb;21(2):126–33.Google Scholar
18.Go, RC, Duke, LW, Harrell, LE, Cody, H, Bassett, SS, Folstein, MF, et al. . Development and validation of a Structured Telephone Interview for Dementia Assessment (STIDA): The NIMH Genetics Initiative. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1997 Oct;10(4):161–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Morris, JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Neurology 1993 Nov;43(11):2412–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Callahan, CMM, Unverzagt, FWP, Hui, SLP, Perkins, AJM, Hendrie, HCM. Six-Item Screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Med Care 2002 Sep;40(9):771–81.Google Scholar
21.Gatz, M, Reynolds, C, Nikolic, J, Lowe, B, Karel, M, Pedersen, N. An empirical test of telephone screening to identify potential dementia cases. Int Psychogeriatr 1995 Fall;7(3):429–38.Google Scholar
22.Gatz, M, Reynolds, CA, John, R, Johansson, B, Mortimer, JA, Pedersen, NL. Telephone screening to identify potential dementia cases in a population-based sample of older adults. Int Psychogeriatr 2002 Sep;14(3):273–89.Google Scholar
23.Jarvenpaa, T, Rinne, JO, Raiha, I, Koskenvuo, M, Lopponen, M, Hinkka, S, et al. . Characteristics of two telephone screens for cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2002;13(3):149–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Debanne, SM, Patterson, MB, Dick, R, Riedel, TM, Schnell, A, Rowland, DY. Validation of a telephone cognitive assessment battery. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997 Nov;45(11):1352–59.Google Scholar
25.Hogervorst, E, Combrinck, M, Lapuerta, P, Rue, J, Swales, K, Budge, M. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test and screening for dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2002;13(1):13–20.Google Scholar
26.Kuslansky, G, Katz, M, Verghese, J, Hall, CB, Lapuerta, P, LaRuffa, G, et al. . Detecting dementia with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test and the Mini-Mental State Examination. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2004 Jan;19(1):89–104.Google Scholar
27.Frank, RM, Byrne, GJ. The clinical utility of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test as a screening test for mild dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000 Apr;15(4):317–24.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Carpenter, B, Strauss, M, Ball, A. Telephone assessment of memory in the elderly. J Clin Geropsychol 1995;1:107–17.Google Scholar
29.Stewart, NJ. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test had high sensitivity and good specificity for detecting mild dementia in older people. Evid Based Nurs 2001 Jan 1;4(1):24.Google Scholar
30.Lipton, RB, Katz, MJ, Kuslansky, G, Sliwinski, MJ, Stewart, WF, Verghese, J, et al. . Screening for dementia by telephone using the Memory Impairment Screen. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51(10):1382–90.Google Scholar
31.Fischbach, RL. Early identification of demented persons in the community. In: Becker, RE, Giacobini, E, editors. Alzheimer disease: current research in early diagnosis. New York: Taylor and Francis, 1990. p. 49–74.Google Scholar
32.Ball, C, McLaren, P. The tele-assessment of cognitive state: a review. J Telemed Telecare 1997;3(3):126–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Chatfield, M, Matthews, FE, Brayne, C. Using the Mini-Mental State Examination for tracking cognition in the older population based on longitudinal data. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55(7):1066–71.Google Scholar
34.Tun, PA, Lachman, ME. Telephone assessment of cognitive function in adulthood: the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone. Age Ageing 2006 Nov;35(6):629–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Resnick, B, Gruber-Baldini, AL, Pretzer-Aboff, I, Galik, E, Buie, VC, Russ, K, et al. . Reliability and validity of the evaluation to sign consent measure. Gerontologist 2007 Feb;47(1):69–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Dunn, LB, Nowrangi, MA, Palmer, BW, Jeste, DV, Saks, ER. Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: a review of instruments. Am J Psychiatry 2006 Aug;163(8):1323–34.Google Scholar