We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
5.Lovelock, D., Degenerate Lagrange densities for vector and tensor fields. Joint Math. Coll., Universities of South Africa and Witwatersrand. (1967) 237–269.Google Scholar
1
1.Bass, H., Finistic dimension and a homological generalization of semi-primary rings. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 95 (1960) 466–488. Google Scholar
2
2. V. Dlab, Matrix representation of perfect rings. Google Scholar
3
3.Eilenberg, S., Homological dimension and syzygies. Ann. of Math.64 (1956) 328–336.Google Scholar
1
1.Brualdi, R.A., Parter, S. V. and Schneider, H., The diagonal equivalence of a nonnegative matrix to a stochastic matrix. J. Math. Anal, and Appl. 16 (1966) 31–50.Google Scholar
2
2.Marcus, M. and Mine, H., A survey of matrix theory and matrix inequalities. (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1964).Google Scholar
3
3.Perfect, Hazel and Mir sky, L., The distribution of positive elements in doubly stochastic matrices. J. Lon. Math. Soc. 40 (1965) 689–698.Google Scholar
4
4.Sinkhorn, R. and Nopp, P . V., Concerning nonnegative matrices and doubly stochastic matrices. Pacific J. Math. 21 (1967) 343–348.Google Scholar