Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:31:11.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elizabeth, Edification, and the Latin Prayer Book of 1560

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Norman L. Jones
Norman L. Jones
Affiliation:
Mr. Jones is assistant professor of history in Utah State University, Logan, Utah
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over the past few years a spate of books and articles have forced scholars to reject the idea that the Anglican church was created as a compromise between Queen Elizabeth, who would have preferred to return to Henrician Catholicism, and radical Protestants, who wished to create in England a godly society modeled on the Swiss Reformation. This historiographic revolution has been led by historians who have challenged J. E. Neale's tale of a Puritan opposition party which was born in 1559 and bedeviled the queen for her entire reign. Demonstrating that the queen achieved the religious settlement she desired in 1559, they have forced us to question anew Elizabeth's attitude toward her church and to challenge some of the assumptions upon which ecclesiastical historians, following Neale, have built their histories of the Elizabethan church.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , June 1984 , pp. 174 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Research for this article was supported in part by a Mellon Faculty Fellowship at Harvard University, 1982–1983.

1. Loach, Jennifer, “Conservatism and Consent in Parliament, 1547–1559,” in The Mid Tudor Polity c. 1540–1560, ed. Tittler, R. and Loach, J. (Totowa, N.J., 1980), pp. 9–29;CrossRefGoogle ScholarGraves, M. A. R., “Thomas Norton the Parliament Man: An Elizabethan M. P., 1559–1581,” Historical Journal 23 (1980): 17–36;CrossRefGoogle ScholarHudson, Winthrop S., The Cambridge Connection and the Elizabethan Settlement (Durham, N.C., 1980);Google ScholarBartlett, Kenneth, “The Role of the Marian Exiles,” in The History of Parliament: The House of Commons, 1558–1603, ed. Hasler, P. W., 1 vol. (London, 1981), 1:102–110;Google ScholarJones, Norman L., Faith by Statute: Parliament and the Settlement of Religion, 1559 (London, 1982).Google Scholar

2. Haugaard, William, Elizabeth and the English Reformation (Cambridge, 1970), pp. 116–117.Google Scholar

3. Clay, William K., ed. Liturgies and Occasional forms of Prayer set forth in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth (Cambridge, 1847), p. xxviiiGoogle Scholar (hereafter referred to as Clay, Liturgies). For a detailed list of the differences between the English and Latin books see Frere, W. H. and Proctor, F., A New History of the Book of Common Prayer (London, 1902), pp. 116–125.Google Scholar

4. Booty, John E., ed. The Godly Kingdom of Tudor England: Great Books of the English Reformation (Wilton, Conn., 1981),Google Scholar discusses this concept at length.

5. Act of Uniformity, 1 Eliz. 1, c. 2 §13.

6. This was the second proposition of the Westminster Disputation held during Eastertide, 1559. Quoted from Holinshed, Raphael, Laste Volume of the Chronicles of England, Scotlande, and Irelande (London, 1577), p. 1801.Google Scholar

7. John, Bruce and Thomas, Perowne, eds. Correspondence of Matthew Parker (Cambridge, 1853), p. 146.Google Scholar

8. Clay, William Keatinge, ed. Private Prayers Put Forth by Authority During the Reign of Queen Elizabeth (Cambridge, 1851), p. 67Google Scholar (hereafter cited as Clay, Private Prayers).

9. Jones, , Faith by Statute, pp. 182–183.Google Scholar

10. On Elizabeth's visitation injunctions of 1559, see Frere, W. H., Visitation Articles and Injunctions of the Period of the Reformation, 3 vols. (London, 1910), 3:8–29;Google ScholarGee, H., The Elizabethan Clergy and the Settlement of Religion, 1558–1564 (Oxford, 1898), pp. 46–65.Google Scholar

11. William, Nicholson, ed. The Remains of Edmund Grindal (Cambridge, 1843), p. 203.Google Scholar

12. Clay, , Liturgies, pp. 301–302.Google Scholar

13. Act of Supremacy, 2 & 3 Edward 6, c. 1 §6.

14. Frere, , Visitation Articles, 3:184, 187.Google Scholar

15. “Sander's Report to Cardinal Moroni,” Catholic Record Society Miscellanea (1905), 1:44.Google Scholar

16. Clay, , Liturgies, pp. 301–302.Google Scholar

17. Bruce, and Perowne, , eds., Parker Correspondence, pp. 133–134.Google Scholar

18. Frere, , Visitation Articles, 3:329.Google Scholar

19. John, Ayre, ed. The Works of John Jewel, 4 vols. (Cambridge, 1850), 4:813.Google Scholar

20. Frere, and Proctor, , Book of Common Prayer, pp. 120–121.Google Scholar

21. Haugaard, , English Reformation, p. 114.Google Scholar

22. Strype, John, Annals of the Reformation, 5 vols. (Oxford, 1824), vol. 1, part 2, p. 564.Google Scholar

23. Clay, , Liturgies, p. 431.Google Scholar

24. Nicholson, , ed., Grindal, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar

25. Acte for the Keping of Hollie daies and Fastinge dayes, 5 & 6 Edward 6, c. 3.

26. Jones, , Faith by Statute, pp. 155–156.Google Scholar

27. Frere, , Visitation Articles, 3:62, 176.Google Scholar

28. Bruce, and Perowne, , eds., Parker Correspondence, p. 133.Google Scholar

29. Clay, , Liturgies, p. xxiv.Google Scholar

30. Clay, , Private Prayers, p. 428.Google Scholar

31. See Clay's, comment on this, Liturgies, p. xxiv.Google Scholar

32. Dictionary on National Biography, s.v. “Haddon, Walter”; Hasler, , House of Commons, 2:235–236;Google Scholar MS 959/28/27, Lambeth Palace Library, London.

33. Clay, , Liturgies, p. xxxii.Google Scholar