Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:38:56.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘PROCLAIMING IT TO GREEKS AND NATIVES, ALONG THE ROWS OF THE CHEQUER-BOARD’: READERS AND VIEWERS OF ACROSTICH INSCRIPTIONS IN GREEK, DEMOTIC AND LATIN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2017

Rachel Mairs
Rachel Mairs*
Affiliation:
University of Reading
*
r.mairs@reading.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Hellenistic and Roman acrostich inscriptions are usually full of verbal and visual clues, which point the reader in the direction of the ‘hidden message’ contained in the vertical lines of the text. The authors of such inscriptions want their audiences to appreciate the skill that has gone into their composition. There are several complementary ways in which the presence of an acrostich might be signalled to the reader or viewer and their attention directed towards it. These include direct verbal statements, or more subtle allusions, within the text of the inscription. But, even without having read its text, the viewer of an inscription containing a ‘hidden message’ is often immediately aware that some kind of wordplay is at work. Acrostichs, palindromes and various kinds of word square are all graphically striking, or their appearance may be enhanced to make them more so. Regular spacing, the repetition of the acrostich in a separate column and the use of painted or incised grids are all ways in which the layout of the text on the stone can invite the viewer to play a word game. In some cases, as I will argue in this paper, acrostich makers envisaged—even intended—the participants in this game to include the illiterate as well as the literate.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , May 2017 , pp. 228 - 246
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In recent years, there has been a number of new studies on acrostich inscriptions, and on those involving wordplay more generally: see the articles in Kwapisz, J., Petrain, D. and Szymański, M. (edd.), The Muse at Play: Riddles and Wordplay in Greek and Latin Poetry (Berlin, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, in particular V. Garulli, ‘Greek acrostic verse inscriptions’, 246–78; and Mairs, R., ‘Acrostich inscriptions at Kalabsha (Roman Talmis): cultural identities and literary games’, Chronique d’Égypte 86 (2011), 281–97Google Scholar, on the inscriptions from Lower Nubia discussed below.

2 Mairs (n. 1), 281–97; R. Mairs, ‘Sopha grammata: Greek acrostichs in inscriptions from Arachosia, Nubia and Libya’, in Kwapisz, Petrain and Szymański (n. 1), 279–306.

3 Text and discussion: Vleeming, S.P., Some Coins of Artaxerxes and Other Short Texts in the Demotic Script Found on Various Objects and Gathered from Many Publications (Leuven, 2001), no. 205, 99–209 Google Scholar; Brunsch, W., ‘Die bilingue Stele des Moschion (Berlin Inv. Nr. 2135 + Cairo J.d'E Nr. 63160)’, Enchoria. Zeitschrift für Demotistik und Koptologie 9 (1979), 5–32 Google Scholar; Bresciani, E., ‘I testi demotici della stele «enigmistica» di Moschione e il bilinguismo culturale nell'Egitto greco-romano’, Egitto e Vicino Oriente 3 (1980), 117–45Google Scholar; Bernand, É., Inscriptions métriques de l’Égypte gréco-romaine. Recherches sur la poésie épigrammatique des Grecs en Égypte (Paris, 1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, no. 108. The full Greek and Demotic text, with translation, is given in the appendix to this article.

4 μερίμνης ἀγαθῆς ‘good thinking’ (B 6); μισθόν ‘reward’ (B 13); φρονῆσαι ‘comprehend, understand’ (B 14); σοφία ‘wisdom’ (B 14); συνιέντι ‘to the one who perceives’ (B 20); πινυτόφρονος ‘of wise/understanding mind’ (C 1); τῶι μηθὲν ἀγνοοῦντι ‘he who is no fool’ (F 9); εὑρών ‘finding’; gm ‘find’ (F 10; G 10); νοῦς ‘mind’ (I 7, I 9); swn ‘knowledge’ (J 6); rx ‘know’ (G 11); ir HAt ‘reflect, consider’ (G 7); πυνθάνομαι ‘learn’ (I 9); mAwy ‘thought’ (J 3).

5 ἀμαθία ‘stupidity’ (B 13); λανθάνω ‘escape notice’ (F 8); συγχέω ‘pour together, mingle, confound’ (F 8); ἀγνόημα ‘ignorance, oversight’ (F 9); ἁμαρτάνων ‘going wrong, erring’ (F 9); Sft ‘err’ (G 9).

6 Implied, I think, in G 7: tS Dr.v=k; the word ‘hand’ also appears in G 8, 9, 13, 14.

7 I am reminded of this passage every time I see a person tapping in vain at the touch screen of a recalcitrant iPad.

8 See Parkinson, R.B., Cracking Codes: The Rosetta Stone and Decipherment (Berkeley, 1999)Google Scholar; Stewart, H.M., ‘A crossword hymn to Mut’, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 57 (1971), 87–104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Noegel, S. and Szpakowska, K., ‘“Word play” in the Ramesside dream manual’, Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur 35 (2006), 193–212 Google Scholar; Faulkner, R.O., ‘Abnormal or cryptic writings in the coffin texts’, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 67 (1981), 173–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zandee, J., An Ancient Egyptian Crossword Puzzle: An Inscription of Neb-wenenef from Thebes (Leiden, 1966)Google Scholar.

9 Butz, P.A., The Art of the Hekatompedon Inscription and the Birth of the Stoikhedon Style (Leiden, 2010), 42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Austin, R.P., ‘Across and down’, G&R 8 (1939), 129–38Google Scholar, at 132: ‘His high opinion of himself will scarcely communicate itself to students of his verses; for they are often bombastic and obscure’; see also below on comparanda.

11 I. Metr. 168: Sotadics, pentameters and hexameters; I. Metr. 169: hexameters and pentameters, concluding in five lines of prose.

12 Adams, J.N., ‘The poets of Bu Njem: language, culture and the centurionate’, JRS 89 (1999), 109–34Google Scholar.

13 line 28 gemma ut auro cluditur sic castram porta decorat; Verg. Aen. 10.134 qualis gemma micat fuluum quae diuidit aurum; see Adams (n. 12), 120.

14 Text and translation: Vleeming (n. 3), whose translation of the Greek was supplied by F.W. Walbank and D.J. Thompson.

15 Text: Bernard, P., Pinault, G.-J. and Rougemont, G., ‘Deux nouvelles inscriptions grecques de l'Asie Centrale’, Journal des Savants 2 (2004), 227–356 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Translation: Nagle, D.B. and Burstein, S.M., Readings in Greek History: Sources and Interpretations (Oxford, 2006), 285 Google Scholar.

16 Text: Bernand, É., Inscriptions métriques de l’Égypte gréco-romaine. Recherches sur la poésie épigrammatique des Grecs en Égypte (Paris, 1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, nos 168 and 169. Translation after Burstein, S.M., Ancient African Civilizations: Kush and Axum (Princeton, NJ, 1997), 66–8Google Scholar.

17 CIL 3.77 = CLE 271. Text and translation: Courtney, E., Musa Lapidaria: A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions (Atlanta, GA, 1995)Google Scholar, no. 26.

18 IPhilae 143. The translation is my own.