Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:12:00.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The dates of Cyril Bailey's Oxford Classical Texts of Lucretius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Leofranc Holford-Strevens  and
Martin Ferguson Smith
Leofranc Holford-Strevens
Affiliation:
Oxford
Martin Ferguson Smith
Affiliation:
Foula, Shetland Islands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , May 2000 , pp. 306 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Martin, J., T. Lucreti Cari De rerum nalura libri sex (Leipzig, 1963), xix.Google Scholar

2 Gordon, C. A., A Bibliography of Lucretius (London, 1962; Winchester, 1985), 67–8.Google Scholar

3 Titi Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex (Oxford, 1947), i.50, iii.1782.

4 These dates remain in the revision of his article by G. W. Williams (1970); in 1996 it was replaced with an article by P. G. and D. P. Fowler, who cite only the second edition and date it 1922.

5 Since 1978 the Clarendon Press has been simply an imprint of the OUP, not a separate business within it.

6 We thank Mr Maw for this information and his assistant Jenny McMorris for finding the publication-date of the second edition.

7 In England, till long after the Second World War, both law and custom made 1 January a normal working day.

8 Brieger, A., BPh W 20 (1900), cols. 1576–8Google Scholar, in issue no. 51 of 22 December; Housman, A. E., CR 14 (1900), 367–8Google Scholar, in the October number; Thomas, P., Revue de I'instruction publique en Belgique 43 (1900), 191–2Google Scholar; Valmaggi, L., Bollettino difilologia classica 7 (1900–1), 271Google Scholar, in issue no. 12 of June 1901. Lambrino himself gives 1899 as the publication-date of Bailey's text; so far as we V know, he is alone in doing so. Gordon (n. 2), 68 gives January 1900.

9 Duff, J. D., CR 37 (1923), 118Google Scholar; Ernout, A., Revue critique d'histoire et de littérature 57 (1923), 63Google Scholar; Merrill, W A., CPh 18 (1928), 184.Google Scholar Marouzeau and Ernout give the publication-year as 1921, presumably from the editor's preface; Merrill gives 1922, Duff no date at all.

10 Rev. cit. (n. 8), 192.

11 Rev. cit. (n. 9).