Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:42:15.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Der Aufbau Der Plautinischen Cantica - Der Aufbau der Plautinischen Cantica. By S. Sudhaus. Leipzig and Berlin: Teubner, 1909.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

E. A. Sonnenschein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 24 , Issue 7 , November 1910 , pp. 222 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1910

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For instance, he divides Casina 621–758 into the following parts: I. 621–634 lamentatio (56 m.), 635–654 (64 m.); total 120 m.; II. 655–682 narratio (96 m.), 683–707 mandata (96 m.): III. 708–738 conventio (64 m.), 738–758 precatio (56 m.); total 120 m. Grand total 432 m.

2 Except Trin. 1115–1124, which consists of 10 + 8 + 10 metra. Here the groups of 10 make an exception; for they are Stollen.

3 See Schröder, , Sophoclis Cantica (1907), p. 65Google Scholar; and Sudhaus, , Aufbau, p. 118.Google Scholar

1 Lines 939a, b would then run—

GR. Mitte modo. TR. At pol ego te adiuvabo; nam mea sententia

Bonis quod bene fit haud perit. GR. Turbida tempestas heri fuit.

Or possibly we might retain the et of the MSS. (= also), reading nam et mea sententia, etc. Adiuvabo is the reading of the MSS. and is rightly retained; but I am not sure that Sudhaus is justified in calling the emendation adiuvo (Müller, accepted by most editors) a ‘flagrant Germanism’; cf. Rud. 1040 eo, Most. 261 non do, 577 clamo, 853, 877, etc.

2 In the running scene of the Stichus (274–325) Sudhaus considers that 280–288 (= 32 m.), 290–300 (= 32 m.) and 302–307 (= 24 m.) represent three runs of Pinacium across the stage, the last at a quicker rate and therefore accomplished in fewer metra. But this involves breaking a sentence in the middle. And what becomes of the lines omitted?