Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:11:21.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Massacre of the Branchidae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

W. W. Tarn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 36 , Issue 3-4 , May 1922 , pp. 63 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1922

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 63 note 1 Herod. 6, 19; .

page 64 note 1 References in F. Cauer, Branchidai in Pauly-Wissowa.

page 64 note 2 See generally Haussoullier, B., Études sur l' Histoire de Milet et du Didymeion (1902); and notes to O.G.I.S. 472. It was waste in 332/1; Callisthenes ap. Strabo. 17, 814. Haussoullier suggests that Callisthenes' story of the spring gushing forth again means that the Milesians had already begun to clear the site. But seepost.Google Scholar

page 64 note 3 To Arrian, Arimazes is unknown; while Diodorus is lost. But Polyaen. 4, 3, 29, which differs considerably from Curtius' version of the siege, probably represents the Cleitarchean tradition; it knows nothing of the supposed crucifixion.

page 64 note 4 Just. 11, 3, 6, ‘eadem indulgentia usurus,’ etc., which is certainly not Ptolemy.

page 66 note 1 Paus. 1, 16, 3; cf. O.G.I.S. 213, 214.

page 66 note 2 Wilamowitz, Gött. Gel. Anz., 1914, p. 72.

page 66 note 3 Kleine Schriften (1910), p. 286, n. 1.