No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2009
page 73 note 1 This hypothesis, though extremely attractive, is not absolutely essential to Buchheit's thesis: the sophisticated readers for whom these poems were written (Buchheit, p. 134, n. 2) would have been perfectly capable of understanding sacellum and templum metaphorically of the book without the aid of a picture (cf. Buchheit, p. 10, n. 2, citing Pindar, Ot.6.1–3, Virgil, G.iii. 13–16).