Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:53:02.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Correction to Classical Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Instead of : ‘I propose to read the last vs. tua est; lecto, etc’ read : I presume that the copyist had before him tuus est lecto, etc., which, by a palaeographic error, became tuus est legio—and then, by grammatical correction, tua est legio—.

Type
Correction
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , April 1896 , pp. 174
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1896

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)