Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:08:26.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Descent of Manuscripts - The Descent of Manuscripts. By A. C. Clark. Oxford: at the Clarendon Press, 1918. 28s. net.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 79 note 1 P2 in Liyy's third decade is such an irresponsible, ignorant meddler who writes a self-satisfied ‘recognobi’ after each book, but it is a problem where he got his right corrections from, if they are his.

page 79 note 1 Shipley's Certain Sources of Corruptions in Latin MSS. is a very useful guide for the passage from uncials to Caroline.

page 80 note 1 Cf. Preface to vol. 2 of Liv. 6–10, when it is published!

page 80 note 2 In the Medicean of the first decade of Livy marginal supplements are often far above or below the right place; evidently the scribe found them in the margin with or without marks for reinsertion.

page 81 note 1 I have discussed some of the first decade in the Preface of the forthcoming vol. 2.

page 82 note 1 For S's lines see below.

page 82 note 2 In the Medicean of 1–10 there are two distortions of the text, probably due to the displacement of quaternions in the predecessor of M similarly in O a quaternion appears to be lost after 4. 30. 14

page 82 note 3 This is P's way: he does not call unnecessary attention to his mistakes and he does not like to mess his beautiful parchment; when he repeats half a word from a line above he quietly goes on as if nothing had happened (I am not sure that the larger repetitions are not corrected by him); Vindob. seems much the same.

page 82 note 4 See Class. Quart. XI (1917), pp. 154 ff., ‘The Codex Agenensis and Valla.’

page 83 note 1 (München. Cod. Lat., 23491). The late A. H. Kyd copied this remaining (if it does remain now) folio of S entirely out for me shortly before his lamented death.

page 83 note 2 As A. H. Kyd, who sent me notice and readings of these fragments, pointed out, this was due to the essent, with which Ρ ends both lines.