Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:31:59.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Method in Study of the Modes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

H. C. Nutting
Affiliation:
University of California

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1901

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 420 note 1 Der Gebrauch des Conjunctivs und Optativs im Sanskrit und Gruchischen.

page 420 note 2 Cf. Bergaigne, A., De eoniunctivi et optativi in Indoeuropaeis linguis conformatione et vi antiquissima. Paris. 1877.Google Scholar

page 420 note 3 Cf. Paul, Principien, §§ 410 and 433. Brugmann, , Comparative Grammar, Vol. iv. p. 459.Google Scholar

page 421 note 1 Morris, E. P., ‘Subjunctive in Independent. Sentences in Plautus,’, A.J.P. Vol. xviii.Google Scholar

E.g., posse, licet

page 421 note 3 The question quid agis? is another that illustrates the working of these same elements. No one mistakes the literal quid agis? (as seen in Cic. in Cat. I. 11. 27) for the quid agis? of greeting, though Plautus continually puns on the double meaning. It is interesting to note further, that in Cicero's Orations quid ago? is allowed once (p. Quinct. 16. 53); quid agam? occurs three or four times.

page 422 note 1 See Class. Rev. xv. p. 52.

page 421 note 2 Greenough makes still another application of this principle in an article on ‘The Contrary to Fact Construction,’ Harv. Studies, Vol. vii.

page 421 note 3 E.g., careful discrimination in the use of the modes.

page 421 note 4 A.J.P. xxi., p. 270.