Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:42:24.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Statius, Poggio, and Politian.’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1918

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 166 note 1 C.R. vol. xxvii. p. 265 f.

page 166 note 2 Vol. iii. pp. 283 and 345, and vol. v. p. 532.

page 166 note 3 Why ‘still’? Is there any definite statement that he ever did meditate an edition?

page 167 note 1 In a letter (dated November 21, 1915) which he permits me to quote.

page 167 note 2 Cf. Verzeichnis der MSS. der Stiftsbibl. von St. Gallen.’ Scherrer, G. (Halle, 1875), P. 298.Google Scholar

page 167 note 3 Cf. Weidmann, , Bibliothek von St. Gallen (St. Gallen, 1821), p. 422: ‘Statius in Thebaide. … In alio libello idem in Achilleidos.’Google Scholar

page 167 note 4 ‘The Zurich MS. C. 62 (saec. xii.) has the St. Gall mark on ff. 195, 207, and appears to be the MS. which is described by Scheuchzer (1713) in a MS. catalogue (c. 366) of books removed from St. Gall to Zurich. It contains Stat. Thebais, Servius Honoratus de finalibus, Theobaldus de natura primarum syllabarum, Marlyrologium Bedae.’

page 167 note 5 Thus N.H. describes as ‘veterrimi,’ Urbinas 341, saec. xi.-xii.; and Vatican. Palat. 1669, saec. xii. partis prioris; and as antiquissimus Paris. 8001 (olim Berneggerianus), saec. xii.-xiii. The dates given for the three MSS. are those assigned to them by Dr. H. M. Bannister, Mr. J. P. Gilson, and M. Omont respectively.

page 167 note 6 Professor Phillimore in a footnote refers to ‘Sylloge v. p. 265’; but this must be a misprint; v. p. 265 contains no mention of Statius.