Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T00:23:31.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure transformations effected by the dehydration of diaspore, goethite and delta ferric oxide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

M. H. Francombe  and
H. P. Rooksby
M. H. Francombe*
Affiliation:
Research Laboratories, The General Electric Company Ltd., Wembley, England
H. P. Rooksby
Affiliation:
Research Laboratories, The General Electric Company Ltd., Wembley, England
*
*Now at: Philco Corporation, Philadelphia, Pa., U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

X-ray powder diffraction studies have been made of the structure changes which occur on dehydrating the minerals diaspore and goethite, and also the synthetically-prepared “δ-Fe2O3.” For diaspore and goethite the changes are interpreted in terms of superstructures referred to a hexagonal, anion lattice sub-unit which is common to both the α-type oxyhydroxides and the anhydrous corundum or hematite structures. The ferromagnetic δ oxide, obtained by rapid oxidation of ferrous hydroxide, is shown to be a true oxyhydroxide of the form FeOOH. It transforms into goethite on heating at about 150°C but the change is incomplete due to a tendency to lose water directly to the atmosphere. An approximate structure analysis has been made, using the X-ray powder data for two relatively well-crystallized δ oxide preparations. It is concluded that the ferric ions occupy the interstices of the anion lattice in such a way that approximately 80 per cent. of the iron is randomly distributed in octahedral sites, while the remainder is similarly placed in tetrahedral sites. This cation distribution enables both the transformation to goethite and the magnetic properties of the oxide to be satisfactorily explained.

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals Bulletin , Volume 4 , Issue 21 , August 1959 , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernal, J. D., Dasgupta, D. R. and Mackay, A. L., 1957. Nature, Lond., 180, 645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deflandre, M., 1932. Bull. Soc. franc. Miner., 55, 140.Google Scholar
Ervln, G., 1952. Acta Cryst., 5, 103.Google Scholar
Finch, G. I. and Sinha, K. P., 1957. Proc. roy. Sac.,A241, 1.Google Scholar
Glemser, O. and Gwinner, E., 1939. Z. anorg. Chem.,240, 163 Google Scholar
Goldsztaub, S., 1931. C. R. .Acad. Sci. Paris, 193, 533.Google Scholar
Wyckoff, R. W. G. 1951. Crystal Structurex. Interscience, New York. Vol. 1, Chapter 4, Table p.54.Google Scholar