Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:20:56.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Copper substitution alone and in the presence of chromium, zinc, cadmium and lead in goethite (α-FeOOH)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

N. Kaur
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources, The University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
B. Singh*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources, The University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
B. J. Kennedy
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia

Abstract

A series of Cu-substituted goethites, single and co-substituted with Cr, Zn, Cd and/or Pb was prepared, having molar ratios equal to 2.00, 3.33 and 5.00 mol%. All the samples contained only goethite, except Cu-, (Cu,Zn)- and (Cu,Pb)-samples synthesized at 5.00 mol% where hematite was also formed. The presence of Cr/Cd suppressed the hematite-forming effects of Cu. The general sequence of metal entry into the single-metal-substituted goethites was Zn = Cr > Cd > Cu > Pb and in di- (5.00 mol%) and tri- (3.33 mol%) metal-substituted goethites was Cu > Zn > Cd > Cr >> Pb. Cu incorporation increased all the unit-cell parameters in single-metal-substituted goethite, and these parameters increased in combination with other metals as follows: Cd > Zn > Cr > Pb in the multimetal-substituted goethites. The Cu-substituted goethite dissolved faster than pure goethite. Co substitutions of Cr/Pb reduced the dissolution rate (kFe), while substitutions of Cd/Zn increased kFe.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cornell, R.M. (1988) The influence of some divalent cations on the transformation of ferrihydrite to more crystalline products. Clay Minerals, 23, 329332.Google Scholar
Cornell, R.M. & Giovanoli, R. (1988) The influence of copper on the transformation of ferrihydrite (5Fe2O3.9H2O) into crystalline products in alkaline media. Polyhedron, 7, 385391.Google Scholar
Cornell, R.M., Posner, A.M. & Quirk, J.P. (1974) Crystal morphology and the dissolution of goethite. Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry, 36, 19371946.Google Scholar
Dudka, S. & Adriano, D.C. (1997) Environmental impacts of metal ore mining and processing: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality, 26, 590602.Google Scholar
Dunitz, J.D. & Orgel, L.E. (1957) Electronic properties of transition-metal oxides—I Distortions from cubic symmetry. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 3, 2029.Google Scholar
Gerth, J. (1990) Unit cell dimensions of pure and trace metal-associated goethites. Geochimica et Cosmochimia Ada, 54, 363371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, B.A. (1997) Rietica for Windows v. 1.7.7. ANSTO, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Huynh, T., Tong, A.R., Singh, B. & Kennedy, B.J. (2002) Studies of synthetic copper containing goethite. Paper no. 1545 in: 17th World Congress of Soil Science, Bangkok, Thailand, 14-20 August 2002, Soil and Fertilizer Society of Thailand.Google Scholar
Inouye, K., Ishikawa, T., Ishii, S. & Kaneko, K. (1972a) Effect of copper(II) on crystallization of alpha-FeOOH. Zeitschrift Fur Anorganische Und Allgemeine Chemie, 391, 8687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inouye, K., Ishikawa, T. & Hozumi, T. (1972b) Effect of copper(II) ions on magnetite formation of mixture of ferrous and ferric hydroxide. Kolloid-Zeitschrift and Zeitschrift Fur Polymere, 250, 262267.Google Scholar
Jang, J.H., Dempsey, B.A., Catchen, G.L. & Burgos, W.D. (2003) Effects of Zn(II), Cu(II), Mn(II), Fe(II), NO3 , or SO4 2- at pH 6.5 and 8.5 on transformations of hydrous ferric oxide (HFO) as evidenced by Mossbauer spectroscopy. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 221, 5568.Google Scholar
Kabai, J. (1973) Determination of specific activation energies of metal oxides and metal oxide hydrates by measurement of the rate of dissolution. Ada Chimica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 78, 5773.Google Scholar
Kaur, N., Grafe, M., Singh, B. & Kennedy, B.J. (2009) Simultaneous incorporations of Cr, Zn, Cd and Pb in the goethite structure. Clays and Clay Minerals, 57, 234250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, N., Singh, B. & Kennedy, B.J. (2010) Dissolution of Cr, Cd, Zn and Pb single- and multi-metal substituted goethite; relation to structural and morphological properties. Clays and Clay Minerals, (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehula, S. & Music, S. (2007) Influence of copper ions on the precipitation of goethite and hematite in highly alkaline media. Journal of Molecular Structure, 834, 154161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim-Nunez, R. & Gilkes, R.J. (1987) Acid dissolution of synthetic metal containing goethites and hematites. Pp. 197204 in: Proceedings of the International Clay Conference, Denver, USA, 1985.Google Scholar
Martinez, C.E. & McBride, M.B. (1998) Coprecipitates of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn in iron oxides: solid phase transformation and metal solubility after aging and thermal treatment. Clays and Clay Minerals, 46, 537545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietveld, H.M. (1969) A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 2, 6571.Google Scholar
Schwertmann, U. (1984) The double dehydroxylation peak of goethite. Thermochimica Ada, 78, 3946.Google Scholar
Schwertmann, U., Gasser, U. & Sticher, H. (1989) Chromium-for-iron substitution in synthetic goethites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Ada, 53, 12931297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sultan, K. (2006) Clay mineralogy of Central Victorian (Creswick) soils: clay mineral contents as a possible tool of environmental indicator. Soil & Sediment Contamination, 15, 339356.Google Scholar
Szytula, A., Burewicz, A., Dimitrijevic, Z., Krasnicki, S., Rzany, H., Todorovic, J., Wanic, A. & Wolski, W. (1968) Neutron diffraction studies of α-FeOOH. Physica Status Solidi, 26, 429434.Google Scholar
Wilcox, D., Dove, B., McDavid, D. & Greer, D. (1995) UTHSCASA Image Tool for Windows. The University of Texas Health Science Centre, San Antonio, Texas, USA.Google Scholar