Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T06:04:42.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretation of the Composition of Vermiculites and Hydrobiotites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Margaret D. Foster
Margaret D. Foster*
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Formulas calculated from modern analyses of vermiculites and hydrobiotites show that these minerals resemble phlogopites and magnesian biotites in tetrahedral and octahedral layer composition, but usually have a higher proportion of trivalent octahedral cations. None of the formulas studied resembles those of ferroan biotites in composition.

In a few formulas the negative layer unit charge and the neutralizing positive interlayer charge are as high as those found in phlogopite; about 1.00 in the half-cell formula, but in most vermiculite formulas the charge on the layer unit and the interlayer charge are considerably lower than in phlogopite. Such a decrease in the amount of these charges may be due to oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+, which would increase the positive octahedral charge, and, consequently, decrease the layer unit charge. Oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+ also explains the higher proportion of trivalent octahedral cations in vermiculites and hydrobiotites.

Few papers furnish both cation exchange data and analyses of the samples studied; consequently it is difficult to correlate interlayer charge and cation exchange capacity, but empirically the interlayer charge multiplied by 200 yields a value that approximates the cation exchange capacity, provided the Mg has been allotted correctly between octahedral and interlayer positions.

On the basis of composition and charge relations, vermiculites may be interpreted as formed from phlogopites or magnesian biotites by replacement of K by Mg.

Type
Symposium on Occurrence and Origin of Vermiculite
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals (National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals) , Volume 10 , February 1961 , pp. 70 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1961

Footnotes

1

Publication authorized by the Director, U.S. Geological Survey.

References

Barshad, I. Vermiculite and its relation to biotite as revealed by base exchange reactions, X-ray analyses, differential thermal curves, and water content. Amer. Min. 1948 33 655–678Google Scholar
Foster, M D. Interpretation of the composition of trioctahedral micas: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 354-B 1960 11–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gevers, T W. Vermiculite at Loolekop, Northeast Transvaal. Geol. Soc. South Africa Trans. 1949 51 133–173Google Scholar
Gruner, J W. The structures of vermiculites and their collapse by dehydration. Amer. Min. 1934 19 557–575Google Scholar
Kanzantzev, V P. On the structure and properties of vermiculite. Mem. Soc. Russe Min. 1934 63 464–480Google Scholar
Roy, B, Romo, L A. Weathering studies. 1. New data on vermiculite. J. Geol. 1957 65 603–610 10.1086/626466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, G F. Trioctahedral minerals in the soil-clays of north-east Scotland. Min. Mag. 1950 29 72–84Google Scholar