Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:10:48.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Salvage and Destruction: The Recycling of Books and Manuscripts in Great Britain during the Second World War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2013

PETER THORSHEIM
PETER THORSHEIM*
Affiliation:
Peter Thorsheim, Department of History, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA; peter.thorsheim@uncc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An analysis of Great Britain's campaigns to recycle books and paper reveals the paradoxes of wartime waste policies: destroying history and culture for the sake of reusing materials, and the impact of recycling on the war machinery's own wastefulness. Conscious of systematic recycling in Nazi Germany and its own dependence on imports, the British government established a salvage department only weeks after the outbreak of war. Beginning in 1940, this department required all large towns to collect recyclable materials. Salvage, beyond lessening shortages, served ideological and psychological aims, because reused materials were turned into weapons. This led to a critical redefinition of recycling as the war progressed. People who previously characterised the Third Reich's recycling programmes as typical fascist control now considered compulsory recycling in Great Britain wholly positive. However, protesters claimed the government was causing irreparable harm by salvaging items whose value far exceeded their worth as scrap. The harvesting of books, periodicals and manuscripts as ‘waste’ paper proved particularly contentious, with some arguing that their own government was adding to the destruction that bombs were causing to Great Britain's cultural inheritance.

Récupération et destruction: le recyclage des livres et des manuscrits en grande-bretagne pendant la deuxième guerre mondiale

Une analyse des campagnes de recyclage des livres et du papier en Grande-Bretagne pendant la guerre met en lumière les paradoxes de ces politiques de récupération que sont la destruction de l'histoire et de la culture pour en réutiliser les matériaux, et l'impact du recyclage sur le gaspillage de la machine de guerre elle-même. Le gouvernement britannique était au courant des opérations de récupération systématiques entreprises en Allemagne et conscient du fait que la Grande-Bretagne dépendait des importations; il a donc mis en place un département de la récupération quelques semaines seulement après le début de la guerre. Dès 1940, ce département exigeait de toutes les villes de collecter les matières recyclables. La récupération allait au-delà de la lutte contre les pénuries: elle avait aussi des buts idéologiques et psychologiques puisque les matières recyclées servaient à fabriquer des armes. La notion de recyclage a donc évolué en profondeur au cours de la guerre. Ceux qui avaient précédemment décrit les programmes de recyclage du Reich comme des instruments de contrôle typiquement fascistes étaient maintenant entièrement favorables au recyclage obligatoire en Grande-Bretagne. Mais selon certains, le gouvernement causait des dégâts irréparables en recyclant des objets dont la valeur à la casse était nettement inférieure à leur valeur réelle. La collecte des livres, des périodiques et des manuscrits pour en recycler le papier s'est révélée particulièrement controversée, d'aucuns allant jusqu'à déclarer que le gouvernement lui-même ajoutait à la destruction de l'héritage culturel causée par les bombes.

Wiederverwertung und zerstörung: die wiederverwertung von büchern und handschriften in großbritannien während des zweiten weltkriegs

Anhand einer Analyse der britischen Initiativen zur Wiederverwertung von Büchern und Papier werden zwei Paradoxien der Abfallpolitik im Krieg deutlich – die Zerstörung historischer und kultureller Wertgegenstände zur Wiederverwendung der Materialien und die Wirkung der Wiederverwertungsmaßnahmen auf die Verschwendung von Materialien durch die Kriegsmaschinerie. Die britische Regierung war sich der systematischen Wiederaufbereitungspolitik im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland und der britischen Abhängigkeit von Importen wohl bewusst. Daher begann sie bereits wenige Wochen nach Ausbruch des Krieges mit dem Aufbau einer Abteilung für die Wiederverwertung von Materialien. Seit 1940 hatten alle großen Städte auf Anweisung dieser Abteilung wiederverwertbare Materialien zu sammeln. Neben der Überbrückung von Ressourcenknappheiten diente die Wiederverwertung auch ideologischen und psychologischen Zwecken, denn wiederverwertete Materialien konnten für die Waffenherstellung genutzt werden. Diese Einstellung führte im Verlauf des Krieges zu einer entscheidenden Neubewertung der Wiederverwertung von Materialien. Die Wiederverwertungsprogramme des Dritten Reiches waren zuvor vielfach als typisch faschistische Überwachungsmaßnahmen verurteilt worden. Die staatlich vorgeschriebene Wiederverwertung von Materialien in Großbritannien wurde jedoch durchweg als positiv wahrgenommen. Gegner warfen der Regierung allerdings vor, durch die Wiederverwertung von Gegenständen, deren historische oder kulturelle Bedeutung ihren Wert als bloßes Altmaterial deutlich überstieg, unwiderrufliche Verluste herbeizuführen. Die Verwertung von Büchern, Zeitschriften und Handschriften als ‘Altpapier’ erwies sich als besonders umstritten. Einige Gegner beschuldigten die Regierung in London, die durch feindliche Bomben verursachte Zerstörung des britischen Kulturerbes noch zu verschlimmern.

Type
Articles
Information
Contemporary European History , Volume 22 , Issue 3: Recycling and Reuse in the Twentieth Century , August 2013 , pp. 431 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Friedrich, Jörg, The Fire: The Bombing of Germany, 1940–1945, trans. Brown, Allison (New York: Columbia University Press, 2006), 300Google Scholar, 479.

2 Wigmore, Ethel, ‘The War and British Medical Libraries’, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 34, 3 (1946), 151–66Google ScholarPubMed, esp. 151.

3 Flower, C. T., ‘Manuscripts and the War’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 4th ser., 25 (1943), 15–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. 21–2.

4 Berwick Sayers, W. C., ‘Britain's Libraries and the War’, Library Quarterly, 14, 2 (1944), 95–9Google Scholar, quotation on 98. Sayers estimated that 95% of these books were pulped and the remainder distributed to war-damaged libraries and members of the armed forces.

5 Jenkinson, Hilary, ‘British Archives and the War’, American Archivist, 7, 1 (1944), 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quotation from 12. For an account of the man by one of his closest colleagues, see Ellis, Roger H., ‘Recollections of Sir Hilary Jenkinson’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 4, 4 (1971), 261–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 The Times, 20 July 1940, 5.

7 Woodward, Donald, ‘Swords into Ploughshares: Recycling in Pre-Indust rial England’, Economic History Review, 38, 2 (1985), 175–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Desrochers, Pierre, ‘Does the Invisible Hand Have a Green Thumb? Incentives, Linkage s, and the Creation of Wealth out of Industrial Waste in Victorian England’, Geographical Journal, 175, 1 (2009), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Calder, Angus, The People's War: Britain, 1939–1945 (New York: Pantheon, 1969)Google Scholar; Longmate, Norman, How We Lived Then: A History of Everyday Life during the Second World War (London: Hutchinson, 1971)Google Scholar.

9 Melosi, Martin V., Garbage in the Cities: Refuse, Reform, and the Environment, 1880–1980 (College Station, Tex.: Texas A&M University Press, 1981)Google Scholar; Strasser, Susan, Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash (New York: Metropolitan Books, 1999)Google Scholar.

10 Zimring, Carl A., Cash for Your Trash: Scrap Recycling in America (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2005)Google Scholar; Hugh T. Rockoff, ‘Keep on Scrapping: The Salvage Drives of World War II’ (Sept. 2007), NBER Working Paper Series, vol. w13418, 2007, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1014795 (accessed 15 April 2013). In Nazi-occupied Europe, the recycling of cultural artefacts was often an attempt to purge national symbols from public space. See Campbell Karlsgodt, Elizabeth, ‘Recycling French Heroes: The Destruction of Bronze Statues under the Vichy Regime’, French Historical Studies, 29, 1 (2006), 143–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Cooper, Tim, ‘Challenging the “Refuse Revolution”: War, Waste and the Rediscovery of Recycling, 1900–1950, Historical Research, 81, 214 (2008), 710–31Google Scholar; Riley, Mark, ‘From Salvage to Recycling: New Agendas or Same Old Rubbish?’, Area 40, 1 (2008), 79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Cooper, ‘Challenging’, 719. Cooper argues that wartime led most people in Britain to temporarily abandon what Bill Luckin has termed ‘the refuse revolution’ of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This revolution, Luckin suggests, involved a major paradigm shift in how British citizens viewed rubbish. Previously, many viewed household discards as valuable materials that should not be allowed to go to waste; after the revolution, they considered rubbish both worthless and harmful. Instead of reusing or recycling waste, it became imperative to destroy it as quickly and completely as possible, through incineration, ocean dumping or land burial. On this refuse revolution, see Bill Luckin, ‘Pollution in the City’, in Daunton, Martin, ed., The Cambridge Urban History of Britain, iii: 1840–1950 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 207–28Google Scholar; and Cooper, Tim, ‘Burying the “Refuse Revolution”: The Rise of Controlled Tipping in Britain, 1920–1960’, Environment and Planning A, 42, 5 (2010), 1033–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Riley, ‘From Salvage to Recycling’, 80.

14 For an insightful analysis of the often blurry distinction between books as texts and as tangible objects, see Price, Leah, How to Do Things with Books in Victorian Britain (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012)Google Scholar. Garbage and recycling have recently gained the attention of philosophers as well. For a notable example of such work, and one which includes particularly interesting arguments about the centrality of ideas about the passage of time, see Scanlon, John, On Garbage (London Reaktion Books, 2005)Google Scholar.

15 Some materials were under the purview of other government agencies. The Ministry of Aircraft Production controlled aluminium, for instance, and the Ministry of Food controlled foodstuffs. The Ministry of Supply also oversaw much of the nation's war production, although these responsibilities were shared by the Admiralty, the Ministry of Aviation and (from 1942) the Ministry of Production. See Hurstfield, Joel, The Control of Raw Materials (London: HMSO, 1953)Google Scholar.

16 Marwick, Arthur, Britain in the Century of Total War: War, Peace and Social Change, 1900–1967 (Boston: Little, Brown, 1968), 242Google Scholar, 268–70; Zweiniger-Bargielowska, Ina, Austerity in Britain: Rationing, Controls, and Consumption, 1939–1955 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar.

17 C. R. Moss, ‘Reclamation of Waste Materials from Refuse in War Time’, Public Cleansing, Jan. 1940, 133, 136; Waste Paper Recovery Association, Ltd., 1955 Annual Report (London, 1956).

18 ‘Waste Paper Merchants’ Annual Banquet in London’, Waste Trade World and the Iron and Steel Scrap Review, 14 Jan. 1939, 10.

19 ‘Germany Wastes Nothing’, Public Cleansing, Dec. 1937, 146.

20 The Times, 22 Oct. 1941, 4; Great Britain, Ministry of Supply, Salvage and Recovery Department, Salvage: Lectures to Schools and Test Papers (With Answers) (1942), 2–3, copy in The National Archives, Kew (hereafter TNA), AVIA 22/3088.

21 Holman, Valerie, Print for Victory: Book Publishing in England, 1939–1945 (London: British Library, 2008), 13–15Google Scholar.

22 Waste Paper Recovery Association, Ltd., 1955 Annual Report (London, 1956).

23 ‘Fourth Monthly Report by the Minister of Supply covering the Month of November’, War Cabinet: Supply and Production, W. P. (R) (39) 114, Nov. 1939, TNA, CAB 68/3/29; ‘Salvage Department’, Waste Trade World and the Iron and Steel Scrap Review, 23 Dec. 1939, 4.

24 The Times, 20 Nov. 1939, 6. Judd served as mayor of Hampstead in the early 1950s and died in 1961 at the age of 82. See The Times, 7 Jan. 1961, 10.

25 ‘Getting a Move On’, Public Cleansing, Jan. 1940, 120.

26 The Times, 3 Feb 1940, 3. On the role of this and other British newspapers during the Second World War, see Koss, Stephen, The Rise and Fall of the Political Press in Britain, ii: The Twentieth Century (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1984), esp. 592–603Google Scholar.

27 The Times, 21 Sept. 1939, 9. For a summary of Greene's life and career, see Lever, Jeremy, ‘Greene, Wilfrid Arthur’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, ed. Matthew, H. C. G. and Harrison, Brian (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

28 Chad Denton, ‘“Récupérez!” The German Origins of French Wartime Salvage Drives, 1939–1945’, in this issue.

29 The Times, 21 Sept. 1939, 9.

30 Davies, Norman, No Simple Victory: World War II in Europe, 1939–1945 (New York: Penguin, 2007), 79–81Google Scholar.

31 Ministry of Supply, Salvage Circular 3 (Jan. 1940), Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, Stratford upon Avon, BRR 55/14/31/3/1.

32 Manchester Guardian, 13 Apr. 1940, 8.

33 Harold Judd to Lady Denman, 6 Jan. 1940, Records of the National Federation of Women's Institutes (hereafter NFWI), The Women's Library, London, 5FWI/A/3/073.

34 Judd to Denman, 16 Jan. 1940, NFWI, 5FWI/A/3/073.

35 Ministry of Supply, Salvage Circular 17 (11 April 1940), Walsall Local History Centre, 235/1. Emphasis in original.

36 ‘Salvage of Waste’, Municipal Review, 11 (May 1940), 108.

37 Ninth Monthly Report of the Ministry of Supply covering April 1940, 9, TNA, CAB 68/6.

38 Draft note on Imports, Shipping and Supplies prepared for Mr Harriman [March 1941], TNA, BT 87/40.

39 ‘Salvage and the Utilization of Waste’, Nature, 29 June 1940, 988–9.

40 The Times, 29 July 1940, 5.

41 The Times, 27 July 1940, 2.

42 Ministry of Supply, Salvage Circular 26 (June 1940), Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, Stratford upon Avon, BRR 55/14/31/6.

43 Ministry of Health, ‘Circular 2073: Waste Paper’, 1 July 1940, TNA, HLG 102/91.

44 Public Cleansing and Salvage, Feb. 1943, 195.

45 HC Debates. 3 July 1941, vol. 372, c1470; ‘The Trade in Parliament’, Waste Trade World and the Iron and Steel Scrap Review, 12 July 1941, 6.

46 Bath Chronicle and Herald, 17 Jan. 1942, 14.

47 Ministry of Supply, draft letter for use by local authorities, 1 Oct. 1941 [post-dated], Ulverston Urban District Council Records, Cumbria Records Office, Barrow, BSUD/U/S/Box 10.

48 Ministry of Supply, Memorandum on Salvage and Recovery (London: HMSO, 1944), 2, 4.

49 ‘Man Who Cannot Read is Now Salvage Sleuth’, Public Cleansing, Jan. 1942, 146.

50 The Times, 3 Mar. 1942, 2.

51 ‘Scottish Centre Annual Meeting’, Public Cleansing, May 1942, 243.

52 The Times, 27 Jan. 1942, 2.

53 The Times, 17 Feb. 1942, 2.

54 The Times, 26 Sept. 1941, 5.

55 The Times, 7 Nov. 1941, 7. Emphasis in original.

56 The Times, 7 Apr. 1942, 2.

57 The Times, 6 May 1942, 5.

58 The Times, 26 Oct. 1942, 2.

59 The Times, 24 July 1943, 5.

60 The Times, 20 July 1943, 6.

61 The Times, 2 Aug. 1943, 5.

62 The Times, 20 Sept. 1943, 2.

63 WVS, Bulletin, Feb. 1943, 2.

64 Ministry of Supply, Salvage Circular 105 (26 Aug. 1943), Ulverston Urban District Council Records, Cumbria Records Office, Barrow, BSUD/U/S/Box 10.

65 ‘Ancient Records for Pulp?’, Waste Trade World and the Iron and Steel Scrap Review, 23 Nov. 1940, 15.

66 Press and Journal (Aberdeen), 13 June 1942, 3.

67 The Times, 26 Jan. 1942, 5.

68 A. N. C. Shelley to Mr Slator, 16 Mar. 1944, TNA, HLG 102/91.

69 Public Assistance Department of Surrey County Council to the Ministry of Health, 26 Nov. 1941, TNA, HLG 102/91.

70 County Councils Association and the Association of Municipal Corporations, memorandum on paper salvage, 26 May 1942, Walsall Local History Centre, 235/3.

71 The Times, 28 Oct. 1941, 2.

72 The Times, 14 Nov. 1941, 2.

73 Press and Journal (Aberdeen), 6 Jan. 1942, 3.

74 The Times, 27 Jan. 1942, 2.

75 The Times, 19 Jan. 1942, 2.

76 Gloucestershire Echo, 5 Feb. 1942, 3.

77 ‘Son's 500 Letters as Salvage’, Public Cleansing, March 1942, 194.

78 Note dated 6 Mar. 1942, East Sussex Record Office, Lewes, SHE 2/8/10. I am grateful to Christopher Whittick for bringing this document to my attention.

79 Access to Archives database, www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/a2a/results.aspx?tab=2&Page=1&ContainAllWords=sent+salvage (accessed 17 Apr. 2013).

80 Cooper, ‘Challenging’, 730.

81 Riley, ‘From Salvage to Recycling’, 86.

82 A. L. Thomson, ‘What is Waste? An Intriguing Question’, Public Cleansing and Salvage, July 1945, 462–3.