Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T14:09:58.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychosocial (im)maturity from adolescence to early adulthood: Distinguishing between adolescence-limited and persisting antisocial behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2013

Kathryn C. Monahan ,
Laurence Steinberg ,
Elizabeth Cauffman  and
Edward P. Mulvey
Kathryn C. Monahan*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Laurence Steinberg
Affiliation:
Temple University
Elizabeth Cauffman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Edward P. Mulvey
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kathryn C. Monahan, Department of Psychology, Sennott Square, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; E-mail: monahan@pitt.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the psychological tradition, desistance from antisocial behavior is viewed as the product of psychosocial maturation, including increases in the ability to control impulses, consider the implications of one's actions on others, delay gratification in the service of longer term goals, and resist the influences of peers. The present study investigates how individual variability in the development of psychosocial maturity is associated with desistance from antisocial behavior in a sample of 1,088 serious juvenile offenders followed from adolescence to early adulthood (ages 14–25). We find that psychosocial maturity continues to develop to the midtwenties and that different developmental patterns of maturation are found among those who desist and those who persist in antisocial behavior. Compared to individuals who desisted from antisocial behavior, youths who persisted exhibited diminished development of psychosocial maturity. Moreover, earlier desistance compared to later desistance is linked to greater psychosocial maturity, suggesting that there is an association between desistance from antisocial behavior and normative increases in psychosocial maturity.

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 25 , Issue 4pt1 , November 2013 , pp. 1093 - 1105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brame, R., Fagan, J., Piquero, A., Schubert, C., & Steinberg, L. (2004). Criminal careers of serious delinquents in two cities. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 256–272. doi:10.1177/1541204004265877CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casey, B. J., Getz, S., & Galvan, A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Developmental Review, 28, 62–77. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.003Google Scholar
Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 741–760.Google Scholar
Cauffman, E., & Woolard, J. (1999). The Future Outlook Inventory. Unpublished manuscript, MacArthur Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., & Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206–213. doi 10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberger, E., Josselson, R., Knerr, C., & Knerr, B. (1974). The measurement and structure of psychosocial maturity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 4, 127–143.Google Scholar
Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Huizinga, D., Esbensen, F., & Weihar, A. (1991). Are there multiple paths to delinquency? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 83–118.Google Scholar
Jones, B., Nagin, D., & Roeder, K. (2001). A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods and Research, 29, 374–393. doi:10.1177/0049124101029003005Google Scholar
Kandel, D., & Yamaguchi, K. (1999). Developmental states of involvement in substance use. In Ott, P., Tarter, R., & Ammerman, R. (Eds.), Sourcebook on substance abuse: Etiology, epidemiology, assessment, and treatment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
King, K. M., Lengua, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2013). Individual differences in the development of self-regulation during pre-adolescence: Connections to context and adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 57–69. doi:10.1007/s10802-012-9665-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambert, D. (1992). Zero inflated Poisson regression with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34, 1–13.Google Scholar
Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 28, 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millstein, S. G., & Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (2002). Judgments about risk and perceived invulnerability in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 399–423. doi:10.1111/1532-7795.00039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modecki, K. L. (2008). Addressing gaps in the maturity of judgment literature: Age differences and delinquency. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 78–91. doi:10.1007/s10979-007-9087-7Google Scholar
Modecki, K. L. (2009). “It's a rush”: Psychosocial content of antisocial decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 183–193. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9150-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffitt, T. E. (2003). Life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial behavior: A 10-year research review and a research agenda. In Lahey, B. B., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (Eds.), Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency (pp. 49–75). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Life-course-persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial behavior. In Cicchetti, D. & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 570–598). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Harrington, H., & Milne, B. J. (2002). Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26 years. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 179–207.Google Scholar
Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., & Mulvey, E. (2009). Trajectories of antisocial behavior and psychosocial maturity from adolescence to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1654–1668. doi:10.1037/a0015862Google Scholar
Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Fagan, J., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., Chassin, G. P., et al. (2004). Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among serious adolescent offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 213–236. doi:10.1177/1541204004265864Google Scholar
Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Piquero, A., Besana, M., Fagan, J., Schubert, C., et al. (2010). Longitudinal offending trajectories among serious, youthful offenders. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 453–475.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S., & Land, K. C. (1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31, 327–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piquero, A. R. (2008). Taking stock of developmental trajectories on criminal activity over the life course. In Liberman, A. (Ed.), The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Piquero, A. R., Blumstein, A., Brame, R., Haapanen, R., Mulvey, E. P., & Nagin, D. S. (2001). Assessing the impact of exposure time and incapacitation on longitudinal trajectories of criminal offending. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 54–74. doi:10.1177/0743558401161005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 555–592. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00997.xGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (2004). SAS/ETS user's guide (Version 9). Cary, NC: Author.Google Scholar
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219Google Scholar
Schubert, C. A., Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Losoya, S. H., Hecker, T., et al. (2004). Operational lessons from the pathways to desistance project. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 237–255. doi:10.1177/1541204004265875Google Scholar
Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002Google Scholar
Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 249–272. doi:10.1007/BF01499023Google Scholar
Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Woolard, J., Graham, S., & Banich, M. (2009). Are adolescents less mature than adults? Minors' access to abortion, the juvenile death penalty, and the alleged APA “flip-flop.” American Psychologist, 64, 583–594. doi:10.1037/a0014763Google Scholar
Steinberg, L., Graham, S., O'Brien, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., & Banich, M. (2009). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80, 28–44.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531–1543. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01244.xGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, L., & Scott, E. (2003). Less guilty by reason of adolescence: Developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, and the juvenile death penalty. American Psychologist, 58, 1009–1018. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.12.1009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742Google Scholar
Thornberry, T., & Krohn, M. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In Duffee, D., Crutchfield, R., Mastrofski, S., Mazerolle, L., McDowall, D., & Ostrom, B. (Eds.), CJ 2000: Innovations in measurement and analysis (pp. 33–83). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Weinberger, D. A., & Schwartz, G. E. (1990). Distress and restraint as superordinate dimensions of self-reported adjustment: A typological perspective. Journal of Personality, 58, 381–417.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, K., & Kandel, D. (1985). On the resolution of role incompatibility: A life event history analysis of family roles and marijuana use. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1284–1325.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G. (1990). The Stanford Time Perspective Inventory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar