Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:24:51.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Putting theory to the test: Examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the Family Check-Up model—CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2015

Gregory M. Fosco ,
Mark Van Ryzin ,
Elizabeth A. Stormshak  and
Thomas J. Dishion
Gregory M. Fosco*
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Mark Van Ryzin
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Elizabeth A. Stormshak
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Thomas J. Dishion
Affiliation:
University of Oregon Arizona State University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Gregory M. Fosco, Pennsylvania State University, 315 Health and Human Development Building, University Park, PA 16802; E-mail: GMF19@psy.edu.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 28 , Special Issue 4pt2: Epigenetics: Development, Psychopathology, Resilience, and Preventive Intervention , November 2016 , pp. 1565
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Upon subsequent analyses with the same data set, we found that there was a miscalculation in the proportions of families receiving indicated-level services in the Family Check-Up (FCU). The sentence starting on page 308 and ending on page 309 should be the following:

Of the 180 families receiving the FCU, 80% (n = 131) received indicated-level support after feedback. Among families that received indicated-level support, 36% received positive behavior support, 71% (previously reported as 68%) received support in limit setting and monitoring skills, and 73% received communication and problem solving support. School-related support was received by 79% (previously reported as 67%).

We regret these errors and any problems they may have caused.

References

Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2014). Putting theory to the test: Examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the Family Check-Up model. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar