Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:30:31.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

L'intervention humanitaire peut-elle être conçue comme un «devoir parfait»?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Stéphane Courtois
Stéphane Courtois
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the claim recently put forward by Terry Nardin, Kok-Chor Tan, and Carla Bagnoli that humanitarian intervention ought to be conceived, not as an imperfect duty (a duty of assistance to the victims of crimes against humanity left to the discretion of the members of the international community), but—assuming that the permissibility conditions have been satisfied—as a perfect duty (an unconditional obligation demanded by justice). After explaining why such a position can be considered as legitimate, it underlines some of its difficulties and provides the elements of a response in order to overcome them.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , Spring 2008 , pp. 291 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Réferences bibliographique

Bagnoli, C. 2006 «Humanitarian Intervention as a Perfect Duty: A Kantian Argument», Nardin, dans T. et Williams, M. S., dir., Humanitarian Intervention, New York, New York University Press, p. 117–140.Google Scholar
Beitz, C. 1999a «International Liberalism and Distributive Justice: A Survey of Recent Thought», World Politics, vol. 51, no 2, p. 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, C. 1999b «Social and Cosmopolitan Liberalism», International Affairs, vol. 75, no 3, p. 515–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, C. 2000 «Rawls's Law of Peoples», Ethics, vol. 110, no 4, p. 669–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A. 2003 «Reforming the International Law of Humanitarian Intervention», Holzgreffe, dans J. L. et Keohanne, R. O., dir., Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 130–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, H. 1984 «Introduction», Bull, dans H., dir., Intervention in World Politics, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Caney, S. 2000 «Humanitarian Intervention and State Sovereignty», Valls, dans A., dir., Ethics in International Affairs: Theories and Cases, Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield, p. 118–120.Google Scholar
Kant, E. 1968 Métaphysique des mœurs. Doctrine de la vertu, Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Kant, E. 1993 Métaphysique des mœurs. Doctrine du droit, Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 1995 Multicultural Citizenship, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 1999 «Justice and Global Inequality», Hurrel, dans Andrew et Woods, Ngaire, dir., Inequality, Globalization and World Politics, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. 2000 «National Self-Determination and Global Justice», Miller, dans D., dir., Citizenship and National Identity, Cambridge, Polity Press, p. 161–179.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 2005 «The Problem of Global Justice», Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 33, no 2, p. 113–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, T. 1983 Law, Morality, and the Relations of States, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nardin, T. 2005 «Response to “Ending Tyranny in Iraq”: Humanitarian Imperialism», Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 19, no 2, p. 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, T. 2006 «Introduction», Nardin, dans T. et Williams, M. S., dir., Humanitarian Intervention, New York, New York University Press, p. 1–28.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. 1988 «World Government, Security, and Global Justice», Luper-Foy, dans S., dir., Problems of International Justice, Londres, Westview Press, p. 263–282.Google Scholar
O'Neill, O. 1986 Faces of Hunger, Londres, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. 1992 «Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty», Ethics, vol. 103, no 1, p. 48–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999a The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999b A Theory of Justice, éd. révisée, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 1986 The Morality of Freedom, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tamir, Y. 1993 Liberal Nationalism, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, K.-C. 2000 Toleration, Diversity, and Global Justice, University Park, The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, K.-C. 2002 «Liberal Nationalism and Cosmopolitan Justice», Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 4–5, p. 431–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K.-C. 2006 «The Duty to Protect», Nardin, dans T. et Williams, M. S., dir., Humanitarian Intervention, New York, New York University Press, p. 84–116.Google Scholar
Tan, K.-C. 2007 «Nationalisme libéral et internationalisme égalitaire», Philosophiques, vol. 34, no 1, p. 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesón, F. R. 2005a «Ending Tyranny in Iraq», Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 19, no 2, p. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesón, F. R. 2005b «Reply to Terry Nardin: Of Tyrans and Empires», Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 19, no 2, p. 27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, M. 2000 Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar