Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T08:41:16.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controverse autour de la philosophie de la Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2010

Michel Ambacher
Michel Ambacher
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes—Discussions
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , March 1963 , pp. 410 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Préface pour le traité du vide, Édit. La Pléiade, p. 534.

2 Recherche de la Vérité. Livre II. De l'imagination. Édit. G. Lewis, p. 157. Vrin 1946.

3 La Pensée et le Mouvant, p. 241. P.U.F.

4 Trad. E. Levinas, p. 134. Vrin 1947.

5 Aubier. Éditions Montaigne, 1946.

6 P. 16.

7 Op. cit. p. 42.

8 Cf. Hegel, G. W. F., Précis de l'Encyclopédie des sciences phibsophiques, trad. J. Gibelin, p. 38. Vrin 1952.Google Scholar

9 Évolution créatrice, p. 269.

10 Loc. cit.