Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:04:16.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Des préférences individuelles aux préférences collectives: ambiguïtés du concept de préférence dans le contexte des théories du choix collectif

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

J. Nicolas Kaufmann
J. Nicolas Kaufmann
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

La théorie du choix social qui s'est développée durant les dernières décennies, notamment dans la ligne des travaux d'Arrow (1951) et de Sen (1970, 1982), ne s'est pas seulement soldée par une série de résultats négatifs exprimés dans les théorèmes d'impossibilité d'Arrow, de Sen et d'autres; ses notions centrales ont aussi été utilisées de manière fort variée au point que cette théorie souffre aujourd'hui d'un déficit important qui se traduit par de multiples indéterminations conceptuelles.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , Winter 1996 , pp. 53 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Arrow, Kenneth 1951 Social Choice and Individual Values, New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Aspremont, Claude d' 1985 «Axioms for Social Welfare Orderings», dans L. Hurwicz, D. Schmeidler et H. Sonnenschein, dir, 1985, p. 77–107.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael E.. 1987 Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Copp, David 1979 «Collective Actions and Secondary Actions», American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 16, p. 117–186.Google Scholar
Copp, David 1984 «What Collectives Are: Agency, Individualism and Legal Theory», Dialogue, vol. 23, n° 2, p. 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1980 Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon 1978 Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds, New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon 1989a The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon 1989b Solomonic Judgements: Studies in the Limitations of Rationality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon et Aanund, Hylland, dir. 1986 Foundations of Social Choice Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I.. 1970 A Theory of Human Action, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gruner, R. 1976 «On the Action of Social Groups», Inquiry, vol. 19, p. 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1976 Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation, Dordrecht, Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1977 Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1979 «Bayesian Decision Theory, Rule Utilitarianism, and Arrow's Impossibility Theorem», Theory and Decision, vol. 11, p. 289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwicz, Leonid, David, Schmeidler et Hugo, Sonnenschein, dir. 1985 Social Goals and Social Organization, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Kelley, Harold K. et Thibaut, John W. 1978 Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence, New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kim, Jagwon 1976 «Intention and Practical Inferences dans J. Manninen et R. Tuomela, dir., Essays on Explanation and Understanding, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1976, p. 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Keith et Carl, Wagner 1981 Rational Consensus in Science and Society: A Philosophical and Mathematical Study, Dordrecht, Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David K. 1969 Convention, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Londey, D. 1978 «On the Action of Teams», Inquiry, vol. 21, p. 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCrimmon, Kenneth R. et Stig, Larsson 1979 «Utility Theory: Axioms Versus “Paradoxes”», dans M. Allais et O. Hagen, dir., Expected Utility and the Allais Paradox, Contemporary Discussions of Decisions under Uncertainty with Allais' Rejoinder, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1979, p. 333–409.Google Scholar
MacCrimmon, Kenneth R. et Messick, David M. 1976 «A Framework for Social Motives», Behavioral Science, vol. 21, p. 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. 1992 Springs of Action: Understanding Intentional Behavior, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nida-Rümelin, Julian, dir. 1993 Praktische Rationalitdt: Grundlagenprobleme und ethische Anwendungen des rational choice Paradigmas, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur 1965 The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satterwhaite, M. A. 1975 «Strategy-Proofness and Arrow's Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions», Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 10, p. 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1971 The Strategy of Conflict, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schick, Frederic 1984 Having Reasons: An Essay on Rationality and Sociality, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoemaker, Paul J. H. 1982 «The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations», Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 20, p. 529–563.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1963 Science, Perception, and Reality, Londres, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1970 Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Francisco, Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1974 «Choice, Orderings and Morality», reproduit dans Sen, 1982, p. 74–84.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1977 «Social Choice Theory: A Re-examination», reproduit dans Sen, 1982, p. 158–200.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1979 «Utilitarianism and Welfarism», Journal of Philosophy, vol. 76, p. 463–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1982 Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1983 «Liberty and Social Choice», trad, franç, sous le titre de «Liberté et choix social», dans A. Sen, Éthique et économie, trad, par Sophie Marnat, Paris, PUF, 1993, p. 159–189.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1987 On Ethics and Economics, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tuomela, Raimo 1984 A Theory of Social Action, Dordrecht, Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomela, Raimo 1989 «Collective Action, Supervenience, and Constitution», Synthese, vol. 80, p. 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomela, Raimo et Kaarlo, Miller 1988 «We-Intentions», Philosophical Studies, vol. 53, p. 115–137. 1992 «We-Intentions, Free-Riding, and Being in Reserve», Erkenntnis, vol. 36, p. 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman-Margalit, Edna 1977a «Coordination Norms and Social Choice», Erkenntnis, vol. 11, p. 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman-Margalit, Edna 1977b The Emergence of Norms, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe et Christian, Arnsperger 1994 «La justice economique comme absence d'envie», introduction à Recherches économiques de Louvain, vol. 60, n° 1, p. 3–9.Google Scholar
Weymark, John A. 1993 «A Reconsideration of the Harsanyi-Sen Debate on Utilitarianism» dans J. Elster et J. E. Roemer, dir., Interpersonal Comparisons of Weil-Being, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993, p. 255–321.Google Scholar
Wright, George Henrik von 1983 Practical Reason, Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar