Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:05:11.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hegel: Metacritics, Philosophical Language, and Memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2018

ZAIDA OLVERA GRANADOS*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Mexico

Abstract

Hegel has a metacritical standpoint that can be related to but not reduced to the Herderian metacritique. Hegel’s philosophical language must not be understood in terms of the opposition between an ‘absolute’ and a ‘finite’ language; rather, it must be understood in terms of the opposition between abstract and concrete language. At a theoretical level, concrete language cannot be understood without assuming an organic function of memory. At the practical level, the difference between abstract and concrete language will be understood as the difference between everyday language and a philosophical one. Hegel justifies this last difference by following Humboldtian standpoints.

La posture hégélienne vis-à-vis du langage philosophique ne doit pas être assimilée d’emblée à la métacritique herderienne ni être comprise en termes d’opposition entre langage «absolu» et langage «fini». La métacritique hégélienne doit plutôt être comprise en termes d’une différence entre langage abstrait et langage concret. Le mode opératoire du langage concret de la philosophie se saisit en ayant recours à une fonction organique de la mémoire et en acceptant, au niveau pratique, une différence entre le langage quotidien et le langage philosophique. Je vais montrer que Hegel peut justifier cette posture en adoptant une perspective humboldtienne.

Type
Original Article/Article original
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burbidge, John 2007 Hegel’s Systematic Contingency. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1972 “Le puits et la Pyramide,” in Marges de la Philosophie. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit, pp. 79103.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, Alfredo 2007 “Logic, Thinking and Langage,” in Von der Logik zur Sprache. Stuttgarter Hegel-Kongress 2005, edited by Bubner, Rüdiger and Hindrich, Gunnar. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 135158.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael 2002 “Herder’s Philosophy of Language, Interpretation and Translation: Three Fundamental Principles.” Review of Metaphysics 56 (2):323356.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael 2013 German Philosophy of Language: From Schlegel to Hegel and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fulda, Hans Friedrich 1991 “Vom Gedächtnis zum Denken,” in Psychologie und Anthropologie oder philosophie des Geistes, edited by Hespe, Franz and Tuschling, Burkhard. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, pp. 321360.Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg 2007 “Metacritique on the Purism of Reason,” in Hamann: Writings on Philosophy and Language, edited and translated by Heynes, Kenneth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205218.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1986 “Wer denkt abstract?,” in Jenaer Schriften 1801-1807. Werke in zwanzig Bände [Werke 2], edited by Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1986 Die Phänomenologie des Geistes. Werke in zwanzig Bände [Werke 3], edited by Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1986 Wissenschaft der Logik I. Werke in zwanzig Bände [Werke 5], edited by Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus. Frankfurt: Surhkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1986 Wissenschaft der Logik II. Werke in zwanzig Bände [Werke 6], edited by Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus. Frankfurt: Surhkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1986 Berliner Schriften 1818-1831. Werke in zwanzig Bände [Werke 11], edited by Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1987 Jenaer Systementwürfe III. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1989 Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse 1830. Erste Teil: Die Wissenschaft der Logik. Mit den mündlichen Zusätzen. Werke in zwanzig Bände [Werke 8], edited by Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1989 Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse 1830. Dritter Teil: Die Philosophie des Geistes. Mit den mündlichen Zusätzen. Werke in zwanzig Bände [Werke 10], edited by Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1991 The Encyclopaedia Logic. Part I of the Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences with the Zusätze. Translated and notes by Geraets, T.F., Suchting, W.A., and Harris, H.S.. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1994 Vorlesungen über die Philosophie des Geistes 1827-1828. Nachgeschrieben von Johann Eduard Erdmann und Ferdinand Walter, edited by Hespe, Franz and Tuschling, Burkhard. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 2010 Philosophy of Mind. Translated by Wallace, W. and Miller, A.V.. Revised with introduction and commentary by Michael Inwood. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 2010 The Science of Logic. Translated by di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried 1799 Einer Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Frankfurt: Hartknoch.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von 1907 Über die Verschiedenheiten des menschlichen Sprachbaues. Gesammelte Schriften. Edited by Leitzmann, Albert. Berlin: Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, BehrsVerlag. Volume VII.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von 1974 “Le duel,” in Introduction à l’œuvre sur le Kavi et autres essais, French translation by Caussat, Pierre. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, pp. 97131.Google Scholar
Jarczyk, Gwendoline 1980 Système et liberté dans la logique de Hegel. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Knappik, Franz 2015 “Hegel über Vorstellung und repräsentationalen Gehalt,”in Das Zusammenspiel von Spekulation und Vorstellung in Hegels enzyklopädischem System, edited by Drilo, Kazimir and Hutter, Axel. Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 85118.Google Scholar
Lejeune, Guillaume 2010 “Système et langage chez Hegel à la lumière du concept logique de ‘paraconsistance’.” Mosaïque, revue des jeunes chercheurs en SHS Lille Nord de France-Belgique francophone 4 (1): 6785.Google Scholar
Magrì, Elisa 2011 “Self-Reference and Logical Memory. Hegel’s Theory of the Concept.” Revista Eletrônica Estudos Hegelianos 15 (1): 6777Google Scholar
McCumber, John 1993 The Company of Words. Hegel, Language, and Systematic Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, Angelica 2006 “The Language of Hegel’s Speculative Philosophy,” in Hegel and Language, edited by Surber, Jere O’Neill. Albany: SUNY, pp. 7591.Google Scholar
Olvera, Zaida 2019 “L’instinct logique de l’entendement et le développement logique du concept.” Hegel Jahrbuch. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Sánchez de León, José Manuel 2013 Zeichen und Subjekt im logischem Diskurs Hegels. Hegel-Studien Beiheft 60. Hamburg: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Surber, Jere O’Neil 2011 “Hegel’s Philosophy of Language: The Unwritten Volume,” in A Companion to Hegel, edited by Houlgate, Stephen and Baur, Michael. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 243261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surber, Jere O’Neil 2012 “Hegel’s Linguistic Thought in the Philosophy of Subjective Spirit: Between Kant and the ‘Metacritics’,” in Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit, edited by Stern, David. Albany: SUNY, pp. 181200.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1975 Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, Jim 2007 Hegel’s Philosophy of Language. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wohlfart, Günter 1981 Der Spekulative Satz. Bemerkungen zum Begriff der Spekulation bei Hegel. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar