Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:12:16.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Le véritable retour des définitions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2011

Pierre Poirier  and
Guillaume Beaulac
Pierre Poirier
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
Guillaume Beaulac
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Symposium/Tribune du livre
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 153 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Carruthers, Peter 2006 The Architecture of Mind, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Engel, Pascal 1996 Philosophie et psychologie, Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. 2008 «Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment and Social Cognition», Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 59, p. 255–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. et Frankish, Keith, dir. 2009 In Two Minds. Dual processes and Beyond, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1983 The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A 2000 The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way. The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A., Garret, Merrill F., Walker, Edward C. T. et Parkes, Cornelia H. 1980 «Against definitions», Cognition, vol. 8, p. 263–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankish, Keith et Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. 2009 «The duality of mind: An historical perspective», dans Evans, J. St. B. T. et Frankish, K., dir., In Two Minds. Dual processes and Beyond, New York, Oxford University Press, p. 1-29.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd 2002 Reckoning with risk: Learning to live with uncertainty, New York, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd 2007 Gut Feelings. The Intelligence of the Unconscious, New York, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Gopnik, Alison et Meltzoff, Andrew N. 1998 Words, Thought, and Theories, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, Alison et Schulz, Laura, dir 2007 Causal Learning. Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glennan, Stuart S. 2005 «The modeler in the crib», Philosophical Explorations, vol. 8, no 3, p. 217–228.Google Scholar
Kornblith, Hilary 2002 Knowledge and its Place in Nature, New York, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, Edouard 2009 Doing Without Concepts, New York, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, Edouard et Seppälä, Selja 2009 À paraître «Against Hybrid Theories of Concepts», Anthropology and Philosophy.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, Andrew N. 2007 «Infants Causal Learning: Intervention, Observation and Imitation», dans Gopnik, A. et Schulz, L., dir., Causal Learning, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 37-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Gregory L. 2002 The Big Book of Concepts, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor et Mervis, Carolyn B. 1975 « Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories», Cognitive Psychology, vol. 7, p. 573–605.Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard 2009 «The magical number two, plus or minus: Dual-process theory as a theory of cognitive kinds», dans Evans, J. St. B. T. et Frankish, K., dir., In Two Minds. Dual processes and Beyond, New York, Oxford University Press, p. 129-146.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E. 1999 Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning, Mahweh (NJ), Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E 2004 The Robot’s Rebellion. Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin, Chicago, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E 2009 What Intelligence Tests Miss. The Psychology of Rational Thought, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E., Toplak, Maggie E. et West, Richard F. 2008 «The development of rational thought: A taxonomy of heuristics and biases», Advances in Child Development and Behaviour, vol. 36, p. 251–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, Keith E. et West, Richard F. 2000 «Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate», Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 23, p. 645–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, Keith E. et West, Richard F. 2008 «On the Relative Independence of Thinking Biases and Cognitive Ability», Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 94, no 4, p. 672–695.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amon et Kahneman, Daniel 1984 «Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment», Psychological Review, vol. 91, p. 293–315.Google Scholar
Wason, Peter C. et Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. 1975 «Dual-process in reasoning?», Cognition, vol. 3, p. 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar