Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:32:29.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Masters in Our Own House: A Reply to Brown

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Jeffrey Foss
Jeffrey Foss
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Interventions/Discussions
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , Winter 1996 , pp. 165 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloor, D. 1984 “The Strengths of the Strong Programme.” In Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn. Edited by Brown, J. R.. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, pp. 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloor, D. 1991 Knowledge and Social Imagery. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J. R. 1989 The Rational and the Social. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, J. R. 1995 “Underdetermination and the Social Side of Science.” Dialogue, 34, 1 (Winter 1995): 147–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, I. B. 1960 The Birth of a New Physics. New York: Doubleday.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, P. 1971 “Weimar Culture, Causality and Quantum Theory.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 3: 1–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1983 The Mismeasure of Man. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. 1976 Proofs and Refutations: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. 1987 Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1988 The Pasteurization of France. Translated by Sheridan, A. and Law, J. from Les Microbes: Guerre et Paix suivi de Irreductions. Paris, 1984. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. 1984 “The Pseudo-Science of Science?” In Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn. Edited by Brown, J. R.. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, pp. 41–73.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1985 Not in Our Genes. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1993 Biology as Ideology. Scarborough, ON: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Matheson, C. 1993 Critical Notice of The Rational and the Social, by Brown, J. R.. Canadian Journal of Philosohy, 23, 1: 125–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulkay, M. 1979 Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Quine, W V. O. 1960 Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W V. O. 1969 “Epistemology Naturalized.” In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, by Quine, W. V. O.. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W V. O. 1970 “On the Reasons for Indeterminacy of Translation.” Journal of Philosophy, 67, 6 (March): 178–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. 1976 The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, J. D. 1968 The Double Helix. New York and Scarborough, ON: Mentor.Google Scholar