Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:36:02.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Right to Justification and Discursive Respect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

THOMAS M. BESCH
THOMAS M. BESCH*
Affiliation:
University of Hradec Kralove
*
*<thomas.besch@sydney.edu.au>
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rainer Forst’s constructivism argues that a right to justification provides a reasonably non-rejectable foundation of justice. With an exemplary focus on his attempt to ground human rights, I argue that this right cannot provide such a foundation. To accord to others such a right is to include them in the scope of discursive respect. But it is reasonably contested whether we should accord to others equal discursive respect. It follows that Forst’s constructivism cannot ground human rights, or justice, categorically. At best, it can ground them hypothetically. This opens the door wide for ethical foundations of human rights.

Le constructivisme de Rainer Forst fait valoir que le droit à la justification fournit une base de la justice qui ne peut raisonnablement être rejetée. En mettant l’accent de façon exemplaire sur sa tentative de fondation des droits de l’homme, je soutiens que ce droit ne peut pas fournir une telle fondation. Accorder ce droit aux autres revient à les inclure dans le champ d’application du respect discursif. Or, le fait que l’on doive accorder aux autres un respect discursif égal fait l’objet d’une contestation sérieuse. Il en résulte que le constructivisme de Forst ne peut pas fonder catégoriquement les droits de l’homme, ni la justice. Au mieux, il les fonde de façon hypothétique. Cela ouvre grand la porte aux fondements éthiques des droits de l’homme.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 703 - 726
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beitz, C. 2009 The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besch, T. M. 2011 “Kantian Constructivism, the Issue of Scope, and Perfectionism: O'Neill on Ethical Standing.” European Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 19/1, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besch, T. M. 2012 “Political Liberalism, the Internal Conception, and the Problem of Public Dogma.” Philosophy and Public Issues (New Series), Vol. 2/1, 153–177.Google Scholar
Besch, T. M. 2013a “On a Reflexive Case for Human Rights.” Journal of East-West Thought, Vol. 3/4, 51–64.Google Scholar
Besch, T. M. 2013b “On Political Legitimacy, Reasonableness, and Perfectionism.” Public Reason, Vol. 5/1, 58–74.Google Scholar
Besch, T. M. 2014 “On Discursive Respect.” Social Theory and Practice, Vol. 40/2, 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estlund, D. 2008 Democratic Authority. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Forst, R. 1999 “The Basic Right to Justification: Toward a Constructivist Conception of Human Rights.” Constellations, Vol. 6/1, 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, R. 2002 Contexts of Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Forst, R. 2003a “Toleration, Justice and Reason.” In The Culture of Toleration in Diverse Societies, eds. McKinnon, C. and Castiglione, D., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 71–85.Google Scholar
Forst, R. 2003b Toleranz im Konflikt. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Forst, R. 2004 “The Limits of Toleration.” Constellations, Vol. 11/3, 312–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, R. 2010 “The Justification of Human Rights and the Basic Right to Justification: A Reflexive Approach.” Ethics, Vol. 120/4, 711–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, R. 2012 The Right to Justification. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (ed.) 2014a Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, R. 2014b Justification and Critique. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. P. 2008 On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, C. 1996 The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, C. 2008 The Autonomy of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBar, M. 2008 “Aristotelian Constructivism.” Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 25/1, 182–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, S. 1991 Liberal Virtues. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Moore, M. 1996 “On Reasonableness.” Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 13/2, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. 1991 Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. 1988 “Ethical Reasoning and Ideological Pluralism.” Ethics, Vol. 98/4, 705–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O. 1989 Constructions of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. 1992 “Vindicating Reason.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Guyer, P., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 280–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O. 1996 Toward Justice and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O. 2000 Bounds of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postema, G. F. 1995 “Public Practical Reason: An Archeology.” Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 12, 43–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1972 A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993 Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1997 “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 64, 765–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999 The Law of Peoples. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2001 Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronzolni, M. 2010 “Construction and Practical Reason: On Intersubjectivity, Abstraction, and Judgment.” Journal of Moral Philosophy, Vol. 7/1, 74–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhoff, U. 2015 “Against Equal Respect and Concern, Equal Rights, and Egalitarian Impartiality.” In Do All Persons Have Equal Moral Worth?, ed. Steinhoff, U., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 142–172.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, J. 2007 “The Moral Reality of Human Rights.” In Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right, ed. Pogge, T., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quong, J. 2011 Liberalism Without Perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. 1987 “Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism.” Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 37/147, 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar