Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T00:45:03.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Virtue Ethics, Politics, and the Function of Laws: The Parent Analogy in Plato's Menexenus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Sandrine Berges
Sandrine Berges
Affiliation:
Bilkent University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Can virtue ethics say anything worthwhile about laws? What would a virtue-ethical account of good laws look like? I argue that a plausible answer to that question can be found in Plato's parent analogies in the Crito and the Menexenus. I go on to show that the Menexenus gives us a philosophical argument to the effect that laws are just only if they enable citizens to flourish. I then argue that the resulting virtue-ethical account of just laws is not viciously paternalistic. Finally, I refute the objection that the virtue-ethical account I am proposing is not distinct from a consequentialist account.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , Spring 2007 , pp. 211 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annas, J. 2005a “Virtue Ethics: What Kind of Naturalism?” In Virtue Ethics, Old and New. Edited by Gardiner, S.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 11–29.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 2005b “Wickedness as Psychological Breakdown.” Southern Journal of Philosophy, 43 (suppl.): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1997 “Modern Moral Philosophy.” In Virtue Ethics. Edited by Crisp, R. and Slote, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 26–44.Google Scholar
Berges, S. Unpublished “Plato's Statesman and Contemporary Virtue Jurisprudence.”Google Scholar
Berges, S. 2004 “Virtue and the Laws: The Parent Analogy in Plato's Crito.” Yeditepe' de Felsefe, 3: 271–87.Google Scholar
Chan, J. 2000 “Legitimacy, Unanimity, and Perfectionism.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29, 1: 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, R., and Slote, M. 1997 “Introduction.” In Virtue Ethics. Edited by Crisp, R. and Slote, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Driver, J. 1996 “The Virtues and Human Nature.” In How Should One Live? Edited by Crisp, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–29.Google Scholar
Foot, P. 1978 Virtues and Vices. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1986 Well Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hamlin, A. 1993 “Welfare.” In A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Edited by Goodin, B. and Pettit, P.. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 651–64.Google Scholar
Huby, P. 1957 “The Menexenus Reconsidered.” Phronesis, 2: 104–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hursthouse, R. 1996 “Normative Virtue Ethics.” In How Should One Live? Edited by Crisp, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, R. 1999 On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. 1963 “Plato's Funeral Oration: The Motive of the Menexenus.” Classical Philology, 58, 4: 220–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 1999 “Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant.” Journal of Ethics, 3: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar