Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:39:25.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuity of Political Philosophy: War and Peace in Secularized Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Francisco S. Naishtat
Francisco S. Naishtat*
Affiliation:
University of Buenos Aires

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I propose to examine here, at the outset, what I call the asymmetry in Thomas Hobbes's thought between his treatment of civil war and war between states, that is to say, between the departure from the state of nature - when that is a condition prevailing between individuals - and the permanency in the state of nature when it forms a condition existing between states. Secondly, I will address the Kantian progression beyond this asymmetry through the dual introduction of the idea of progress and of ‘cosmo-political’ peace. The attention given in recent years by Habermas to the Kantian idea of perpetual peace [Habermas, 1996], the recent events in Kosovo and Chechnya, and their implications for the shape of an international penal tribunal to judge crimes against humanity, invigorate the questions of civil peace and of rights which transcend state frontiers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 48 , Issue 192 , December 2000 , pp. 76 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2000

References

Arendt, H. (1991), Juger. Sur la philosophie politique de Kant (Paris: Seuil).Google Scholar
Costa, M.V. (1997), Thomas Hobbes: Aspectos del Contractualismo (Ed. Univedidad Nacional de La Plata).Google Scholar
Gauthier, D.P. (1979), The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996), La Paix Perpétuelle: Le Bicentenaire d'une idée kantienne (Cerf).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1999), 'Humanidad y bestialidad: una guerra en los confines entre derecho y moral.' TS, translation of a review in Die Zeit, autumn.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1971), Le Léviathan (Editions Sirey).Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1992), Diálogo entre un filósofo y un jurista y escritos autobigráficos (Tecnos).Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1930), Selections (Scribner's Sons).Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1996), Leviathan (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1971), Abrégé du Traité de la Nature Humaine (Aubier).Google Scholar
Kavka, G. (1986), Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, E. (1980), Fondements de la Métaphysique des Moeurs (1785) (Vrin).Google Scholar
Kant, E. (1974), Vers la Paix Perpétuelle (1795) (PUF).Google Scholar
Kant, E. (1985), Réponse a la question: Qu'est-ce que les Lumières? trans. Wismann, H. (Ed. de La Pléiade).Google Scholar
Kant, E. (1990), 'Idée d'une histoire universelle d'un point de vue cosmopolitique', in Kant, E., Opuscules sur l'histoire (GF-Flammarion).Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1983), Perpetual Peace and Other Essays, trans. Humphrey, T. (Indianopolis: Hackett).Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. (1988) Critique and Crisis (Cambridge: MIT).Google Scholar
Peters, R. (1956), Hobbes (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Renault, A. (1997), Kant aujourd'hui (Paris: Aubier).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1972), La notion du politique, trans. Steinhauser, M.-L. (Calmann-Lévy).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2001), Le Léviathan dans la doctrine de l'Etat de T. Hobbes, trans. Trierweiler, D. (Paris: Seuil).Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (1965), Natural Right and History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, L. and Cropsey, J. (1994), Histoire de la philosophie politique, trans. Sedeyn, O. (PUF).Google Scholar