Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:54:42.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Critical Overview of the Psychiatric Approaches to Shamanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Philippe Mitrani

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As Kennedy has shown (1973: 1149), the question of whether the shaman is a disturbed individual (neurotic, psychotic, or schizophrenic) or is on the contrary a gifted, balanced and perfectly well-adjusted person, constitutes one of the oldest of all anthropological debates. Indeed R. Hamayon and L. Delaby (1977: 8) have pointed out that “the tendency to attribute a pathological source to shamanism, and to reduce its manifestations to the manipulation of epileptic and psychotic episodes” appeared simultaneously with the publication of the first studies on the subject, in the second half of the nineteenth century. Slavic authors in particular, most notably Bogoras (1910) and Czaplicka (1914), were anxious to establish a connection between shamanism and “Arctic hysteria.” Ohlmarks (1939), developing this theory, distinguished between Arctic and sub-Arctic shamanism in order to identify the degree of psychopathology in each shaman. Struck by the frequency of these types of phenomena in the Arctic regions, the authors believed that they had discovered their cause in race, heredity, and climate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 40 , Issue 158 , June 1992 , pp. 145 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

Footnotes

1.

Philippe Mitrani was still relatively young when he died, in 1983. We would like to thank the Société d'Ethnographie for permitting us to reprint this article, which was published in L'Ethnographie, no. 87-88, 1982 (special issue: Voyages Chamaniques Deux), but is now out of print. The editors of Diogenes consider it to be the best overview on the subject extant in French.

References

Ackerknecht, E.H., “Psychopathology, Primitive Medicine and Primitive Culture,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 14, 1943, 30–67.Google Scholar
Bogoras, W., “The Chuckchee Religion,” Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, II, no. 2,1907.Google Scholar
Bastide, R., Le Rêve, la Transe et la Folie, Paris: Flammarion, 1972.Google Scholar
Boyer, L. Bryce, et al., “Comparison of the Shamans and the Pseudo-Shamans of the Apache of the Mescalero Indian Reservation: A Rorschach Study,” Journal of Prospective Technique and Personality Development 28, 1964, pp. 173–180.Google ScholarPubMed
Boyer, L. Bryce,.” Folk Psychiatry of the Apaches of the Mescalero Indian Reservation,” in Magic, Faith and Healing, Fiev, A., ed., New York, Free Press of Glencoe McMillan 1964.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, E., “Possession and Trance in Cross Cultural Studies of Mental Health,” Ethnopsychiatry and Alternative Therapies, Lebra, W., ed., University Press of Hawaii, volume 88, 1976, pp. 48–55.Google Scholar
Butt, A., “Réalité et idéal dans la pratique chamanique,” L'Homme, t. II, no 3, Sept.-Dec., 1962, pp. 5–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, L.J., and Baxter, J., “The Process - Reactive Distinction and Patient's Subculture,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 136, 1963, pp. 352–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaumeil, J.-P., “Voir, savoir, pouvoir, chamanisme chex les Yagua du Nord-Est péruvien,” thèse pour le doctorat de. 3eme cycle, E.H.E.S.S. 1932, p. 473.Google Scholar
Czaplicka, M., Aboriginal Siberia: a Study in Social Anthropology, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1914.Google Scholar
Devereux, G., Essais d'ethnopsychiatrie générale, Paris, Gallimard, Bibliothèque des sciences humaines, 1970.Google Scholar
Fabrega, H. Jr. and Silver, D., “Some Social and Psychological Properties of Zinacanteco Shamans,” Behavioral Sciences 15, 1970, pp. 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S., Formulations on the Two Principles of Mental Functioning, 1911, Standard Edition, vol. 12, London, Hogarth Press 1958.Google Scholar
Gillin, G., “Magical Fright,” Psychiatry, II, 1948, pp. 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamayon, R., and Delaby, L., ”Presentation,” Voyages Chamaniques, 1976. L'Ethnographie 1977, nos. 74-75, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
Hippler, A.E., “Shamans, Curers and Personality: Suggestions Toward a Theoretical Model,” in Ethnopsychiatry and Alternative Therapies, Ebra, W., ed., University Press of Hawaii, 1976.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J.G., “Cultural Psychiatry,” in Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Honigmann, John J., ed., Chicago, Rand McNally Publishing Company, 1973, pp. 1119–1198.Google Scholar
Labarre, W., “Shamanic Origins of Religion - and Medicine,” Journal of Psychiatric Drugs, Vol. II, no. 1-2, Jan.-June 1979, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
Langness, L., “Hysterical Psychoses and Possession,” in Ethnopsychiatry and Alternative Therapies, Lebra, W., ed., University Press of Hawaii, 1976, pp. 56–57.Google Scholar
Lantis, M., Eskimo Childhood and Interpersonal Relationships, Seattle, University of Washington Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., “Introduction á l'œuvre de Marcel Mauss,” in Mauss, M., Sociologie et anthropologie, P.U.F. 1966, pp. IX–LII.Google Scholar
Lévy-Bruhl, C., Les fonctions mentales da.ns les sociétés inférieures. La mentalité primitive (1910), Paris, 1922.Google Scholar
Lewis, J.M., Religion, Ecstatic: An Anthropological Study of Spirit Possession and Shamanism. Penguin Books, 1971.Google Scholar
Lot-Falck, É., “Psychopathes et chamanes yakoutes,” in Pouillon, J. and Maranda, P. (eds.), Échanges et communications. Mélanges offerts à Claude Lévi-Strauss … II, Paris -La Haye, Mouton, 1970, pp. 115–129.Google Scholar
Nadel, S.F., “A Study of Shamanism in the Nuba Mountains,” in Reader in Comparative Religion, Lessa, W.A. and Vogt, E.Z., (eds.), New York, Harper and Row, 1965.Google Scholar
Ohlmarks, A., Studien zum Problem des Shamanismus, Lund, 1939.Google Scholar
Opler, M.K., Culture and Mental Health, New York, Macmillan, 1959.Google Scholar
Opler, M.K., ”On Devereux's Discussion of Acute Shamanism,” American Anthropologist 63,1961, pp. 1091–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhard, J., “Shamanism and Spirit Possession: The Definition Problem,” in Spirit Possession in the Nepal Himalayas, Hitchcock, John T. and Jones, Rex L., (eds), Warminster and Phillips Ltd., 1976, pp. 12–20.Google Scholar
Sasaki, Y., “Psychiatric Study of the Shaman in Japan,” in Mental Health Research in Asia and the Pacific, Candill, W., and Lin, T. (eds.), Honolulu, East-West Center Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Silverman, J., “Shamans and Acute Schizophrenia,” American Anthropologist 69,1967, pp. 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, A.F.C., Religion: An Anthropological View, New York: Random House, 1966.Google Scholar
Wilden, A., System and structure, London, Tavistock Publications, 1972.Google Scholar
Wilden, A., Essays on Communication and Exchange, London, Tavistock Publications, 1980.Google Scholar