No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 July 2024
Archaeological discoveries, unless of unusual beauty, are generally of less inherent interest than the conclusions to which they point. Not that they are merely evidence in the court-room sense of the word; they certainly spur the imagination, and provide tangible links with those vast, unknown areas of human knowledge which scholarship seeks to restore to us. The public interest in recovered documents of the past, however, seems mainly in the discovery of the objects themselves rather than in the interpretation of those objects. It is as if proving there was a past at a given date is of more interest than the life which made up that past.
It is evident, for example, that public interest in the Dead Sea Scrolls is fading, now that publication of some of the new texts contained in them allows a preliminary assessment of their significance. Contact with the minds of men who composed them seems to be of lesser moment to many than the physical existence of manuscripts written and made use of two thousand years ago.
1 P. Kahle, Die hebräischen Handschriften aus der Höhle. Stuttgart: Kohlhammerverlag, 1951, p. 61.
2 K. G. Kuhn, ‘Über den ursprünglichen Sinn des Abendmahls', Evangelische Theologie 50/51 Heft 11/12, 1951.
3 Kuhn, Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche, Heft 2, 1950.
4 Revue Historique, Vol. CCIV, Oct.-Dec., 1950.