Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:48:58.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Law and Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Kathia Martin-Chenut
Kathia Martin-Chenut*
Affiliation:
Collège de France, Paris

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This contribution intends to examine the role of democracy in the evolution of international law, and equally the role of the latter in the advancement of democracy, or, one might say, in its ‘reinvention'. Two aspects of this broad theme are addressed: the influence of processes of democratization at the level of the individual nation on the evolution of international law, and the extent of penetration of democracy and democratic mechanisms within the processes of creation and application of international law. A rich record of examples drawn by international jurisprudence is used to illustrate these complementary processes.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , November 2008 , pp. 33 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2008

References

Agamben, G. (2003) État d'exception, trans Joël Gaynaud. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourdon, W. (1999) ‘Rôle de la société civile et des ONG’, in La Cour pénale internationale. Paris: La documentation française, p. 89–95.Google Scholar
Bourquin, M. (1950) ‘L'humanisation du droit des gens’, in La technique et les principes du droit public. Études en l'honneur de Georges Scelle. Paris: LGDJ, vol. II.Google Scholar
Boutros-Ghali, B. (2003) ‘The Interaction between Democracy and Development’, Report of the International Panel on Democracy and Development. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Chipaux, F. (2007) ‘M. Musharraf inaugure son mandat de “président civil” du Pakistan’, Le Monde, 30 novembre.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. (1994) Pour un droit commun. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. (1998) Trois défis pour un ordre mondial. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. (2004) Les forces imaginantes du droit, I: Le relatif et l'universel. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. (2006) Les forces imaginantes du droit, II: Le pluralisme ordonné. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. (2007) Les forces imaginantes du droit, III: La refondation des pouvoirs. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie (1986) ‘Conclusions’, in Dupuy, P.-M. & Bettati, M. (eds), Les ONG et le droit international. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Gros Espielll, H. (1989) ‘La Convention américaine et la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme. Analyse comparative’, RCADI, VI (218): 190–191.Google Scholar
Karl, T.L. and Schmitter, P.C. (1992) ‘Modes of transition in Latin America, Southern Europe and Eastern Europe’, ISSJ 43: 269–284.Google Scholar
Martin-Chenut, Kathia (under press) ‘O sistema penal de exceção instaurado durante a ditadura militar brasileira confrontado com as exigências do direito internacional dos direitos humanos’, in Santos, C. MacDowell, de Almeida Teles, E. L. & de Almeida Teles, J. (eds), Desarquivando a ditadura: memória e justiça no Brasil. São Paulo: UCITEC.Google Scholar
Mattelart, A. (2005) ‘Quem tem medo da diversidade cultural?’, Le monde diplomatique (Brazilian edition), octobre.Google Scholar
Sicilianos, Linos-Alexandre (2002) ‘Les Nations Unies et la démocratisation de l'État. Nouvelles tendances’, in Mehdi, R. (ed.) La contribution des Nations Unies à la démocratisation de l'État. Paris: Pedone.Google Scholar
Tardu, M. (2007) ‘Le nouveau Conseil des droits de l'homme aux Nations Unies: Décadence ou résurrection?’, Revue trim. des dr. de l'homme 72: 967–992.Google Scholar