Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:50:41.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Current Problem Concerning the Localization of Brain Processes: A Critical Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

H. Hécaen  and
G. Lantéri-Laura
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For almost two hundred years the problem of localization of the brain processes has been provoking discussion in the fields of medicine, philosophy, and in general critical reflection that at times is expressed in acute polemic terms—phrenology, the disputes over aphasia between 1861 and 1865, the Bergsonian interpretation of P. Marie's works, and so on—and at times dies down and seems to disappear. In the past quarter of a century, this discussion has not lost any of its fascination, but it cannot possibly be tackled without at least a minimum of historical background. We therefore propose, first of all, to review the main elements highlighting the development of the problem, since its present state becomes meaningful only in relation to the recent past. Since we cannot permit ourselves to recapitulate all aspects of its history in the course of this article, we shall give examples in the four fields we feel to be the most pertinent: human and animal neuropsychology, neurophysiology and neurochemistry. Finally, we shall set forth our reflections on the heuristic meaning of these examples, and endeavor to draw conclusions, some of which may answer problems that have never been raised before.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 23 , Issue 91 , January 1975 , pp. 16 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Bibliographical Notes

Rather than provide an extensive list of references, that could not be exhaustive, we preferred to quote the title of some books or articles of a fairly general nature, which all contain bibliographies.Google Scholar
Axelrod, J.:. “Neurotransmitters,” Scientific American, n. 197, p. 59–66.Google Scholar
Bonin, G. VON: Essai sur le cortex cérébral. Traduction française. Paris, Masson et Cie, 1955.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K.: Language and Language Disturbances. New York, Grune and Stratton, 1948.Google Scholar
Hécaen, H.: Introduction à la Neuropsychologie, Paris, Larousse, 1972.Google Scholar
Hécaen, H.: “Le cerveau et le langage,” La Recherche, 1972, n. 27, p. 829–837.Google Scholar
Hécaen, H. et Dubois, J.: La naissance de la Neuropsychologie du Langage. Paris, Flammarion, 1969.Google Scholar
Hubel, D.H.: “The visual cortex of the brain,” Scientific American, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeannerod, M.: “Les deux mécanismes de la vision,” La Recherche, 1974, Vol. 5, n. 41, p. 23–32.Google Scholar
Lantéri-Laura, G.: Histoire de la phrénologie, Paris, P.U.F., 1970.Google Scholar
Luria, A.R.: The Working Brain, An Introduction to Neuropsychology. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Milner, B.: “Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man,” British Medical Bulletin, 1971, n. 27, p. 272–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmit, F.O. et Worden, F.G. (eds.): The Neurosciences. Third Study Program; London, The M.I.T. Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Soury, J.: Le système nerveux central. Paris, Carré et Naud, 1899.Google Scholar
Sperry, R.W., Gazzaniga, M.S. and Bogen, J.E.: “Interhemispheric relationships: the neocortical commissures syndromes of hemisphere deconnection,” p. 273–290 in Hand Book of Clinical Neurology, edited by Winken, J.P., Bruyn, G.W.. North Holland Publishing Co., 1969.Google Scholar