No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2024
Is it only yesterday's humanism, whether religious or secular in origin, that is dying - and is it really dying? - or is it more profoundly the very paradigm of humanity? At least it is worth asking the question. Do we not hear on every side today that everything is ‘constructed’ and ‘formated’? No inherited moral standard now seems acceptable, nor any reference to any sort of human nature or naturality. The only idea that henceforth finds acceptance is that of the infinite plasticity of the human, leaving individuals free to shape themselves as they wish beyond any commonly received standard, since only defiance of the norm seems to be the source and proof of freedom.
1. They are mainly French. This detail is not unimportant. Indeed we may ask whether concern about globalization, developments in biology and the undefined opportunities they open up, is not more alive in France today than anywhere else and whether the fears expressed by French intellectuals are not explained simply by the decline and loss of influence of the ‘great nation', the death of a republican model of social organization that is increasingly undermined by the predominance of Anglo-American ethical, legal and economic norms that give more emphasis to the market, science and technology than the state and the law.
2. The articles brought together here are versions of a number of papers given on 13 and 14 June 2001at a conference held at the Maison des Cultures du Monde (Paris) and organized by Alain Caillé and Shmuel Trigano for GEODE (Groupe d'Etude et d'Observation de la Démocratie), a research unit at the University of Paris-X Nanterre which is linked to the CNRS (FRE 2257). Other contributors to the conference were Jean-Jacques Salomon, David Le Breton, Jean-Louis Laville, Danièle Hervieu-Léger, Roberte Hamayon, Jean-Pierre Dupuy, Jean Baubérot, Christian Lazzeri, François Vatin, Pascal Michon and Carmen Bernand.