Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:23:36.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wounded Bodies, Recovered Bodies: Discourses around female sexual mutilations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Tanella Boni
Tanella Boni*
Affiliation:
University of Cocody-Abidjan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study reviews various discourses around female sexual mutilation from the perspective of the human and social sciences, and also current debates between supporters of the cultural argument and those defending the universality of human rights. An aside about the Dogon myth of world order recorded by Marcel Griaule in Dieu d’eau or Aristotle's philosophical discourse in the Reproduction of Animals is required in order to widen the debate and see its importance as regards the dignity of the human person. In Aristotle woman is a freak accident, she interrupts the circle that goes from man to man so that he can start off again. Woman is a “catastrophe” necessary to the exercise of the male genitalia; her body is naturally mutilated and incomplete. In the Dogon myth the clitoris rises up like a termite-hill, it is oversized and must be knocked down, that is, excised. Between excessive size, monstrousness and ugliness come discourses which have since time immemorial accompanied and justified wounding the female genitals. But today a medical type of discourse, which is widely accepted, is aiming to repair excised genitalia and give back to women the happiness of a recovered body. Thus we may ask what “woman's dignity” consists of and whether it is the same as the “dignity of the human person”.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 15 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2010

References

Amlak, A.Z. (1999) ‘Le point sur l’excision dans le Corne de l’Afrique’, Présence Africaine, 160: 100–108.Google Scholar
Aristotle (1992) On the parts of animals & On the generation of animals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Auffret, S. (1982) Des couteaux contre des femmes. Paris: des femmes.Google Scholar
Bangré, H. (2004a) ‘Le clitoris retrouvé’, www.afrik.com/article6941.html.Google Scholar
Bangré, H. (2004b) ‘L’aiguille contre le couteau’, www.afrik.com/article7029.html.Google Scholar
Bangré, H. (2004c) ‘Croisade musulmane contre l’excision’, www.afrik.com/article7362.html.Google Scholar
Bangré, H. (2006a) ‘La victoire sur l’excision du Dr Foldès’, www.afrik.com/article9370.html.Google Scholar
Bangré, H. (2006b) ‘Burkina Faso: un gynécologue congolais “répare” les excisions’, www.afrik.com/article10464.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bangré, H. (2006c) ‘Égypte: des leaders musulmans disent non à l’excision’, www.afrik.com/article10761.html.Google Scholar
Bangré, H. (2008) ‘Faire “reconstruire” son clitoris: un dilemme culturel’, www.afrik.com/article14191.html.Google Scholar
Bah, D. & Tabet, S. (2006) On m’a volé mon enfance. Paris: Anne Carrière.Google Scholar
Bellas Cabane, C. (2008) La Coupure. L’excision ou les identités douloureuses. Paris: La Dispute.Google Scholar
Boni, T. (2005) Matins de couvre-feu. Paris: Le Serpent à plumes.Google Scholar
Boni, T. (2008) Que vivent les femmes d’Afrique? Paris: Panama.Google Scholar
Boussuge, A. & Thiébaut, E. (2006) Le Pacte d’Awa. Pour en finir avec les mutilations sexuelles. Paris: GAMS/ Syros.Google Scholar
Couchard, F. (2003) L’excision. Paris: PUF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirie, W. (1998) Desert flower: the extraordinary journey of a desert nomad. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
El Saadawi, N. (1982) The hidden face of Eve: women in the Arab world, translated by Sherif Hetata; foreword by Irene L. Gendzier. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Erlich, M. (1986) La Femme blessée. Essai sur les mutilations sexuelles féminines. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Fainzang, S. (1984) ‘L’excision ici et maintenant’, in Collection Les mutilations du sexe des femmes aujourd’hui en France, pp. 23–43. Paris: Tierce.Google Scholar
Fainzang, S. (1985) ‘Circoncision, excision et rapports de domination’, Anthropologie et sociétés, 9(1): 117- 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraisse, G. (1996) La Différence des sexes. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1946) ‘Femininity’, New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Griaule, M. (1948) Dieu d’eau. Entretiens avec Ogotemmêli. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Groult, B. (1975) Ainsi soit-elle. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Henry, N. & Weil-Curiel, L. (2007) Exciseuse. Entretien avec Hawa Gréou. Grainville: City.Google Scholar
Héritier, F. (2002) Masculin/Féminin II. Dissoudre la hiérarchie. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Herodotus, (1973) Stories. London: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Herzberger-Fofana, P. (1999) ‘Excision et émigration: la situation en Allemagne’, Présence Africaine, 160: 109–116.Google Scholar
Herzberger-Fofana, P. (2000) ‘Les mutilations génitales féminines (MGF)’, http://aflit.arts.uwa.edu.au/MGF1.html.Google Scholar
Hirsi Ali, A. (2008) Infidel. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ilboudo, M. (2006) Droit de cité. Être femme au Burkina Faso. Montréal: Remue-Ménage.Google Scholar
Irigaray, L. (1985) This sex which is not one, translated by Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP.Google Scholar
Kandji, S. (1999) ‘L’excision. De la circoncision négro-pharaonique à la clitoridectomie sémito-orientale. Des sources traditionnelles islamiques’. Présence Africaine, 160: 42–54.Google Scholar
Katoucha, (2007) Dans ma chair. Paris: Michel Lafon.Google Scholar
Keita, F. (1998) Rebelle. Paris-Abidjan: Présence Africaine/NEI.Google Scholar
Kenyatta, J. (1979) Facing Mount Kenya. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Khady, & Cuny, M. (2005) Mutilée. Paris: Oh ! éditions.Google Scholar
Lefeuvre-Déotte, M. (1997) L’Excision en procès: un différend culturel? Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Mbow, P. (1999) ‘Pénaliser un fait culturel: quelle solution à l’excision?’, Présence Africaine, 160: 67–77.Google Scholar
Mottin-Sylla, M-H. (1990) ‘Excision au Sénégal’, Études et recherches, 137. Dakar: ENDA.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. (1987) ‘Les mutilations sexuelles féminines. L’excision en question’, Présence Africaine, 141: 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prolongeau, H. (2006) Victoire sur l’excision. Pierre Foldès, le chirurgien qui redonne l’espoir aux femmes mutilées. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Serbin, S. (2004) Reines d’Afrique et héroïnes de la diaspora noire. Saint-Maur-des-Fossés: Sépia.Google Scholar
Sindzingre, N. (1977) ‘Le plus et le moins: à propos de l’excision’, Cahiers d’Études Africaines, 65: 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sow Sibibé, A. (1999) ‘Les mutilations génitales féminines au Sénégal’, Présence Africaine, 160: 55–66.Google Scholar
Tchak, S. (1999) La Sexualité féminine en Afrique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Thiam, A. (1978) La Parole aux Négresses, preface by Benoîte Groult. Paris: Denoël.Google Scholar
Van Gennep, A. (1960) The rites of passage. Translated by Vizedom, Monika B. and Gabrielle L. Caffee. Introd. by Kimball, Solon T.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weil, S. (1949) L’Enracinement. Prélude à une déclaration des devoirs envers l’être humain. Paris: Gallimard. www.afrik.com/excision [Dossier excision].Google Scholar
WHO (2008) Eliminating female genital mutilation. An interagency statement. Geneva: WHO, http://www.unfpa.org/upload/lib_pub_file/756_filename_fgm.pdf.Google Scholar
Zwang, G. (1977) ‘Les mutilations sexuelles féminines, techniques et résultats’, in Les Mutilations sexuelles féminines infligées aux enfants. Lausanne: Conférence de presse de Terre des hommes.Google Scholar