Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:00:37.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Review of Portable Basic Life Support Equipment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2020

Shuai Ma
Affiliation:
Institute of Disaster Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Bin Fan
Affiliation:
Institute of Disaster Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Haojun Fan
Affiliation:
Institute of Disaster Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Shike Hou*
Affiliation:
Institute of Disaster Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. Shike Hou, Institute of Disaster Medicine, Tianjin University, No. 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, PR China 300072 (e-mail: housk86@163.com).

Abstract

In this article, the development course and current research status of physiological information monitoring equipment are briefly reviewed and analyzed. The research progress of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) equipment at home and abroad, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of existing CPR equipment, are the main points of discussion. This article discusses the design feasibility and technical points of the portable integrated basic life support machine, based on existing equipment and technology, and summarizes possible interesting future research directions.

Type
Systematic Review
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Jing, L. Working principle and common faults of LIFEPAK 20e defibrillation monitor. Chinese Journal of Medical Devices. 2019;032(001):129130.Google Scholar
Zheng, ZJ, Croft, JB, Giles, WH, et al. Sudden cardiac death in the United States, 1989 to 1998. Circulation. 2001;104(18):21582163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thakur, RK, Natale, A. Advances in ICD therapy: “ripples of the past”. Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics. 2011;3(3):xiii.Google Scholar
Luchuan, X, Yamei, Y. Troubleshooting of GE Cardioserv defibrillation monitor without charging. Chinese Medical Equipment Journal. 2011;32(04):129.Google Scholar
Lu, Z. Component structure and troubleshooting of Zoll M series defibrillation pacing monitor. Medical and Health Equipment. 2012;33(05):140141.Google Scholar
Chaonan, Z, Jianjie, W, Gang, X, et al. Miniature cardiac function monitor with dual-electrode. Chinese Journal of Medical Physics. 2015, 32(6):864869.Google Scholar
Kewu, W, Shengxiang, X, Yongtao, J, et al. Design of a new external automatic defibrillation system based on STM32. Chinese Journal of Medical Devices. 2018;42(01):2226.Google Scholar
Eftestøl, T, Stokka, SE, Kvaløy, JT, et al. A machine learning approach to model a probabilistic relationship between parameters reflecting quality of chest compressions and physiological response during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2018;130:e23e24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xianwei, H. Comparative study of AutoPulse and traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in emergency treatment. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Care. 2018;16(06):110111.Google Scholar
Zhicheng, L, Xiumei, S, Juanhua, W. Clinical application of saber cardiopulmonary resuscitator in cardiac arrest. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine. 2012;21(08):167168.Google Scholar
Lin, W, Fei, Q, Yu, D. Meta analysis of the application of Lucas cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine in the rescue of patients with cardiac arrest. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2019;39(3):242247.Google Scholar
Xuankun, C, Xinsheng, W, Jianrong, L, et al. Application of Lanswick cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine in pre hospital emergency treatment of patients with cardiac arrest. Chinese Contemporary Medicine. 2018;25(06):120122.Google Scholar
Stiell, IG, Brown, SP, Christenson, J, et al. What is the role of chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation? Crit Care Med. 2012;40(4):11921198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torney, H, O’Hare, P, Davis, L, et al. A usability study of a critical man–machine interface: can layperson responders perform optimal compression rates when using a public access defibrillator with automated real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems. 2016;46(5):749754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chunjun, H, Guofeng, C, Sen, Y, et al. Effect evaluation of the third generation cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine in out of hospital cardiac arrest. Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018;27(4):415418.Google Scholar
Niranjana, E, Saranya, S, Kaarikaa Sree, S, et al. Knee-jerk cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) machine. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering. 2019;8(12):15141517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordeen, CA. Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a case against the machine. Cardiology Clinics. 2018;36(3):375386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shuxia, Y, Yanan, Y, Tongxing, Z. Application of digital multi-functional cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine in the emergency treatment of patients with cardiac arrest. Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use. 2016;9(23):8384.Google Scholar
Lina, F. The joint application of portable ventilator and defibrillation monitor. Chinese Journal of Medical Devices. 2009;22(08):81.Google Scholar